Suppr超能文献

填充剂:500例病例分析及文献综述

Bulking agents: an analysis of 500 cases and review of the literature.

作者信息

Mohr Stefan, Siegenthaler Martine, Mueller Michael D, Kuhn Annette

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Effingerstr. 102, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Feb;24(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1834-8. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common, impacts women's quality of life, and generates high costs. Physiotherapy is the first-line therapy, and if it fails, suburethral slings are the gold standard in SUI surgery. Bulking agents injected periurethrally might be a beneficial alternative, but there is a paucity of data on bulking therapy. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of bulking agents in the setting of a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

In the last 13 years, 514 elderly women with SUI were treated by injection therapy with either collagen (Contigen), hyaluronic acid (Zuidex), ethylene vinyl alcohol (Tegress), or polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid). Subjective and objective outcome was recorded at the 12-month postoperative appointment using the King's Health Questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS) describing their incontinence severity, standardized pad test, and urethral pressure profile.

RESULTS

Demographic data were equally distributed in all four groups of agents used. Sixty-one patients were lost to follow-up (10.6 %). Statistically significant changes were found for maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP), pad weight, and VAS before and after bulking for the four agents used. Pad test was negative in 73.2 % of patients after bulking therapy. Subjective assessment showed improvements in general health and role limitations. The overall complication rate was low for all agents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows improvement in incontinence after bulking therapy according to subjective and objective outcomes in an elderly population. In contrast to earlier reports, side effects due to injections were few and mild. We can advocate bulking therapy for treating SUI, as it is simple, safe, and shows both objective and subjective improvement and relief.

摘要

引言与假设

压力性尿失禁(SUI)很常见,会影响女性生活质量并产生高昂成本。物理治疗是一线治疗方法,若治疗失败,尿道下吊带术是SUI手术的金标准。经尿道周围注射填充剂可能是一种有益的替代方法,但关于填充剂治疗的数据较少。本研究的目的是在三级转诊中心前瞻性分析填充剂的疗效和安全性。

方法

在过去13年中,514名老年SUI女性接受了注射治疗,使用的填充剂有胶原蛋白(Contigen)、透明质酸(Zuidex)、乙烯-乙烯醇共聚物(Tegress)或聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(Bulkamid)。在术后12个月的随访中,使用国王健康问卷、描述尿失禁严重程度的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、标准化尿垫试验和尿道压力描记法记录主观和客观结果。

结果

在使用的所有四组填充剂中,人口统计学数据分布均匀。61名患者失访(10.6%)。对于所使用的四种填充剂,填充前后最大尿道闭合压(MUCP)、尿垫重量和VAS有统计学显著变化。填充治疗后73.2%的患者尿垫试验为阴性。主观评估显示总体健康和角色限制方面有所改善。所有填充剂的总体并发症发生率都很低。

结论

本研究表明,根据老年人群的主观和客观结果,填充剂治疗后尿失禁情况有所改善。与早期报告相反,注射引起的副作用很少且轻微。我们可以提倡使用填充剂治疗SUI,因为它简单、安全,且能在客观和主观上都有所改善和缓解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验