Krhut Jan, Martan Alois, Jurakova Michaela, Nemec David, Masata Jaromir, Zvara Peter
Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, Poruba, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):301-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2834-2. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
Information on urethral bulking therapy in women after previous pelvic radiotherapy is lacking. This study compared the safety and efficacy of polyacrylamide intraurethral injections in patients with and without previous radiotherapy.
A total of 46 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were enrolled in this multicenter prospective trial. Group A consisted of 24 patients with previous radiotherapy to the pelvis for the treatment of a gynaecological malignancy. Group B consisted of 22 patients without previous radiotherapy. All patients were treated with a transurethral injection of a bulking solution (Bulkamid). The average follow-up was 12.4 months. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to compare the results before and after the procedure within the groups, and the two-sample Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons between groups.
Complete continence was achieved in 25 % of patients in group A and in 36.4 % of patients in group B. Significantly reduced urine leakage was observed in both groups (p = 0.0164 in group A and p = 0.0002 in group B). The total scores in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire decreased by 5.2 in group A (p = 0.0000) and 6.36 in group B (p = 0.0001). The scores for the Total Patient Perception of Bladder Condition decreased by 1.54 in group A (p = 0.0001) and 2.59 in group B (p = 0.0000), with a significant difference between groups (p = 0.0224). No clinically significant changes in urodynamic parameters were observed. No severe adverse events were noted.
Based on our results, we conclude that urethral bulking therapy is a valuable treatment option in patients with severe SUI who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for the treatment of gynaecological malignancy.
目前缺乏关于既往盆腔放疗后女性尿道填充治疗的信息。本研究比较了聚丙烯酰胺尿道内注射在既往接受过放疗和未接受过放疗患者中的安全性和有效性。
46例严重压力性尿失禁(SUI)患者纳入了这项多中心前瞻性试验。A组由24例既往因妇科恶性肿瘤接受盆腔放疗的患者组成。B组由22例未接受过放疗的患者组成。所有患者均接受经尿道注射填充溶液(Bulkamid)治疗。平均随访时间为12.4个月。采用配对Wilcoxon检验比较组内治疗前后的结果,采用两样本Wilcoxon检验进行组间比较。
A组25%的患者和B组36.4%的患者实现了完全控尿。两组患者的尿失禁均显著减少(A组p = 0.0164,B组p = 0.0002)。国际尿失禁咨询问卷的总分在A组下降了5.2(p = 0.0000),在B组下降了6.36(p = 0.0001)。膀胱状况患者总体感知评分在A组下降了1.54(p = 0.0001),在B组下降了2.59(p = 0.0000),两组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0224)。未观察到尿动力学参数有临床显著变化。未发现严重不良事件。
基于我们的研究结果,我们得出结论,尿道填充治疗对于因妇科恶性肿瘤接受盆腔放疗的严重SUI患者是一种有价值的治疗选择。