Dramé B S I, Dabo M, Diani N, Cissé B
CHU Hôpital du Mali, Missabougou, Bamako, Mali.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2012 Aug;105(3):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s13149-012-0239-8. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
The aim of this study is to describe the difficulties related to problems of supply and use of antivenom serum (SAV) in the district of Bamako. A retrospective study over a span of five years (January 1998-December 2002) and an interview with the staff of various facilities were conducted. The study included 2 wholesalers of pharmaceuticals, 20 private pharmacies, and 2 hospital pharmacies as they were involved in antivenom trades. A market-driving ability survey of driving practice was conducted in 37 community health centers (CHCs) and 4 dispensaries because they performed antivenom treatments during the study period. A total of 3,318 doses of antivenom were bought, including 84.4% by the People Pharmacy of Mali (PPM), a public organization, and 15.6% by Laborex, a private company. These were out of stock in 1999. Three kinds of SAV were ordered: the polyvalent IPSER Africa (1,200 vials or 36.2%), FAV Africa (318 vials or 9.6%), and Sii anti-snake venom polyvalent serum (1,800 vials or 54.2%). Orders from PPM involved IPSER Africa (Pasteur Mérieux Serum & Vaccines) and Sii anti-snake venom polyvalent serum (Serum Institute of India), and those from Laborex involved IPSER Africa and FAVAfrica (Aventis Pasteur). Onehalf of private pharmacies (54.3%) had made at least one order of SAV. The PPM lost 50% of 2,000 vials of SAV in 1996 due to the expiration of vials that were bought. Private pharmacies lost 3.6% of stocks due to expiration. Prices varied depending on the type of service and the point of sale. Costs of vials were 19,440-35,000 CFA francs (29.6-53.4 euros) for Sii antivenom and 50,200-63,000 CFA francs (76.5-96.1 euros) for FAV Africa antivenom. In CHCs, 59.5% of prescribers were unaware of the indications and methods of proper administration of the SAV, 32.3% ignored the existence of SAV, and 30.9% were skeptical about its effectiveness in treatment of envenomation by snakebite.
本研究旨在描述巴马科地区抗蛇毒血清(SAV)供应和使用问题所涉及的困难。开展了一项为期五年(1998年1月至2002年12月)的回顾性研究,并对各机构工作人员进行了访谈。该研究涵盖了2家药品批发商、20家私人药店和2家医院药房,因为它们都参与了抗蛇毒血清交易。对37家社区卫生中心(CHC)和4家诊所进行了驱动实践的市场驱动能力调查,因为它们在研究期间进行抗蛇毒血清治疗。共购买了3318剂抗蛇毒血清,其中84.4%由公共组织马里人民药房(PPM)购买,15.6%由私人公司Laborex购买。这些血清在1999年缺货。订购了三种抗蛇毒血清:非洲多价IPSER(1200瓶,占36.2%)、非洲FAV(318瓶,占9.6%)和印度抗蛇毒多价血清(1800瓶,占54.2%)。PPM的订单涉及非洲IPSER(巴斯德梅里厄血清与疫苗公司)和印度抗蛇毒多价血清(印度血清研究所),Laborex的订单涉及非洲IPSER和非洲FAV(安万特巴斯德公司)。一半的私人药店(54.3%)至少订购过一次抗蛇毒血清。1996年,PPM因所购小瓶过期损失了2000瓶抗蛇毒血清中的50%。私人药店因过期损失了3.6%的库存。价格因服务类型和销售点而异。印度抗蛇毒血清小瓶的成本为19440 - 35000非洲法郎(29.6 - 53.4欧元),非洲FAV抗蛇毒血清小瓶的成本为50200 - 63000非洲法郎(76.5 - 96.1欧元)。在社区卫生中心,59.5%的开处方者不知道抗蛇毒血清的适应症和正确给药方法,32.3%不知道有抗蛇毒血清,30.9%对其治疗蛇咬伤中毒的有效性表示怀疑。