Suppr超能文献

单剂量口服氟康唑与单剂量局部应用咪康唑治疗急性外阴阴道念珠菌病的比较

Single-dose oral fluconazole versus single-dose topical miconazole for the treatment of acute vulvovaginal candidosis.

作者信息

van Heusden A M, Merkus H M, Corbeij R S, Oosterbaan H P, Stoot J E, Ubachs H M, Verhoeff A

机构信息

Maria and St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(5):417-22. doi: 10.3109/00016349009013305.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy, safety and patient preference of a single oral dose of 150 mg fluconazole with a single intravaginal dose of 1200 mg miconazole in vaginal candidosis. To investigate the effect of treatment on Candida colonization of throat and rectum.

DESIGN

Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel, randomized trial. Ninety-nine patients with symptomatic and mycologically verified candidosis were given 150 mg fluconazole with an intravaginal dummy, or 1200 mg miconazole with an oral dummy. Patients with an inadequate short-term response were given a second dose.

RESULTS

At each visit a patient self assessment and an investigators' global assessment were recorded, and cultures were set up. Adverse events were recorded and laboratory tests were performed. Clinical cure or improvement (investigators' assessment) was obtained in 100% (short-term) and 95% (long term) of the fluconazole group and in 94% and 90%, respectively, of the miconazole group. Patients considered the treatment excellent or good in 81% (short-term) and 88% (long-term) in the fluconazole group and in 84% and 76%, respectively, of the miconazole group. Mycological cure was achieved in 98% (short-term) and 73% (long-term) of the fluconazole group and in 96% and 82% respectively in the miconazole group. The differences in results were not significant. Both treatments significantly reduced the number of positive rectal cultures: neither treatment had a significant effect on throat cultures. Four percent of the patients preferred intravaginal therapy.

CONCLUSION

A single dose fluconazole is as safe and effective as a single dose of miconazole.

摘要

目的

比较单剂量口服150mg氟康唑与单剂量阴道内给予1200mg咪康唑治疗阴道念珠菌病的疗效、安全性及患者偏好。研究治疗对咽喉和直肠念珠菌定植的影响。

设计

双盲、双模拟、平行、随机试验。99例有症状且经真菌学证实的念珠菌病患者,分别给予含阴道安慰剂的150mg氟康唑,或含口服安慰剂的1200mg咪康唑。短期反应欠佳的患者给予第二剂。

结果

每次访视时记录患者自我评估和研究者整体评估,并进行培养。记录不良事件并进行实验室检查。氟康唑组短期和长期临床治愈或改善(研究者评估)的比例分别为100%和95%,咪康唑组分别为94%和90%。氟康唑组患者认为治疗优秀或良好的短期和长期比例分别为81%和88%,咪康唑组分别为84%和76%。氟康唑组短期和长期真菌学治愈的比例分别为98%和73%,咪康唑组分别为96%和82%。结果差异无统计学意义。两种治疗均显著减少直肠培养阳性数量:两种治疗对咽喉培养均无显著影响。4%的患者更喜欢阴道内治疗。

结论

单剂量氟康唑与单剂量咪康唑一样安全有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验