Mhaskar Vikram Arun, Pai Sudhir
Department of Orthopaedics, St. Johns Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Asian Spine J. 2012 Jun;6(2):131-5. doi: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.131. Epub 2012 May 31.
Prospective cohort study.
To determine whether there was any change in the quality of life of patients in sedentary/non sedentary occupations treated with epidural steroid injection for lumbar disc herniations using the 8 components of the SF 36 questionnaire.Overview of Literature: No previously done similar study published.
No previously done similar study published.
Ninety patients comprising sedentary and non sedentary occupations with lumbar disc herniations on magnetic resonance imaging who were treated with epidural steroid injection at St. John's Hospital Bangalore who met the Spinal Outcomes Research Trial eligibility criteria from April 2009 to May 2010.
Of the 90 patients evaluated 44 were of Sedentary and 46 were of non sedentary activity levels, At 6 months primary outcomes physical functioning (p = 0.573, in difference between sedentary and non sedentary, improvement p = 0.001) energy/fatigue (difference between the two p = 0.917, improvement p = 0.001), emotional well being (difference p = 0.912, improvement, p = 0.001), social functioning (difference p = 0.523, improvement p = 0.232), pain (difference p = 0.535, improvement p = 0.001), general health (difference p = 0.738, improvement p < 0.001).
There was a statistically significant improvement in patients of both the sedentary and non sedentary groups p < 0.001 in all components of the SF36 in both sedentary and non sedentary patients except social functioning where the improvement was not statistically significant, and there was no significant difference between non sedentary and sedentary populations over time.
前瞻性队列研究。
使用SF-36问卷的8个组成部分,确定接受硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的久坐/非久坐职业患者的生活质量是否有任何变化。文献综述:此前未发表过类似研究。
2009年4月至2010年5月期间,在班加罗尔圣约翰医院接受硬膜外类固醇注射治疗、符合脊柱结局研究试验纳入标准、经磁共振成像诊断为腰椎间盘突出症的90例患者,包括久坐和非久坐职业患者。
在评估的90例患者中,44例为久坐活动水平,46例为非久坐活动水平。在6个月时,主要结局方面,身体功能(久坐和非久坐之间差异p = 0.573,改善p = 0.001)、精力/疲劳(两者之间差异p = 0.917,改善p = 0.001)、情绪健康(差异p = 0.912,改善p = 0.001)、社会功能(差异p = 0.523,改善p = 0.232)、疼痛(差异p = 0.535,改善p = 0.001)、总体健康(差异p = 0.738,改善p < 0.001)。
久坐和非久坐组患者在SF-36的所有组成部分(除社会功能改善无统计学意义外)均有统计学显著改善(p < 0.001),且随着时间推移,非久坐和久坐人群之间无显著差异。