• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁把最好的留到最后?情感序列偏好的年龄差异。

Who saves the best for last? Age differences in preferences for affective sequences.

机构信息

Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):840-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028747. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1037/a0028747
PMID:22708536
Abstract

We examined age differences in preferences for the temporal sequence of emotional events. In 2 studies, participants were asked to select the order in which they would like to view a series of emotionally salient images. Study 1 (N = 87; aged 21-88 years) elicited sequence preferences both directly (via a sequence construction task) and indirectly (via a temporal discounting task). Study 2 (N = 90; aged 21-89 years) used a modified version of the sequence construction task in which the sequence was selected prospectively instead of concurrently. Across both studies, younger participants preferred increasingly positive sequences, but this preference was negatively associated with age. Future time perspective was associated with both age and sequence preferences. In contrast, age differences in sequence preferences were not explained by personality traits, affective responses, or age-related decrements in cognitive functioning.

摘要

我们研究了人们对情绪事件时间顺序的偏好随年龄的变化。在两项研究中,要求参与者选择他们希望观看一系列情绪相关图片的顺序。研究 1(N=87;年龄 21-88 岁)通过序列构建任务和时间折扣任务直接(直接)和间接(间接)地引出序列偏好。研究 2(N=90;年龄 21-89 岁)使用了一种改良的序列构建任务,其中序列是前瞻性选择的,而不是同时选择的。在这两项研究中,年轻的参与者更喜欢越来越积极的序列,但这种偏好与年龄呈负相关。未来时间视角与年龄和序列偏好都有关。相比之下,序列偏好的年龄差异不能用人格特质、情感反应或与年龄相关的认知功能下降来解释。

相似文献

1
Who saves the best for last? Age differences in preferences for affective sequences.谁把最好的留到最后?情感序列偏好的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):840-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028747. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
2
Age differences in temporal discounting: the role of dispositional affect and anticipated emotions.年龄对时间折扣的影响:性格情绪和预期情绪的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):274-284. doi: 10.1037/a0023280.
3
Colors and emotions: preferences and combinations.颜色与情感:偏好与组合
J Gen Psychol. 1995 Jan;122(1):5-17. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1995.9921217.
4
Age differences in valence judgments of emotional faces: the influence of personality traits and current mood.情绪面孔效价判断中的年龄差异:人格特质与当前情绪的影响
Exp Aging Res. 2011 Oct;37(5):503-15. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.619468.
5
Influence of emotional distraction on working memory performance in borderline personality disorder.情绪分散对边缘型人格障碍工作记忆表现的影响。
Psychol Med. 2012 Oct;42(10):2181-92. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000153. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
6
Multidimensional motor sequence learning is impaired in older but not younger or middle-aged adults.多维运动序列学习在老年人中受损,但在年轻人或中年人中未受损。
Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;88(3):351-62. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070131. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
7
The shared signal hypothesis: effects of emotion-gaze congruency in infant and adult visual preferences.共享信号假说:情绪与注视一致性对婴儿和成人视觉偏好的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;31(Pt 1):15-29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02069.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Age Effects in Sequence-Construction for a Continuous Cognitive Task: Similar Sequence-Trends but Fewer Switch-Points.连续认知任务序列构建中的年龄效应:相似的序列趋势但较少的转换点。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Mar 9;75(4):762-771. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby090.
9
Age differences in emotional reactions: arousal and age-relevance count.年龄对情绪反应的影响:唤醒度和与年龄的相关性很重要。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Dec;26(4):966-78. doi: 10.1037/a0023424. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
10
Age differences in three facets of empathy: performance-based evidence.年龄在同理心三个方面的差异:基于表现的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):60-70. doi: 10.1037/a0021138.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleasure before business: emotions and age effects on daily activity scheduling.先娱乐后工作:情绪和年龄对日常活动安排的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44245-w.
2
Temporal discounting across adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人时间折扣的研究进展:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Feb;37(1):111-124. doi: 10.1037/pag0000634.
3
The Bounded Ending Effect in the Domain of Football Gambling: High Risks Are Not Always Preferred at the End.足球博彩领域的有界终点效应:高风险并不总是在最后被偏好。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Dec;38(4):1323-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10085-4. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Perceived personal deadlines for late-life preparation across adulthood.成年期对晚年准备的个人认知期限。
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Sep 28;18(2):227-238. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00581-8. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.年龄对时间偏好的影响:任务类型、结果特征和协变量的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz097.
6
Taking the Biggest First: Age Differences in Preferences for Monetary and Hedonic Sequences.优先考虑最大的:货币和享乐序列偏好中的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Aug 21;74(6):964-974. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx160.
7
Preferences for Temporal Sequences of Real Outcomes Differ Across Domains but do not Vary by Age.不同领域的真实结果时间序列的偏好不同,但与年龄无关。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):430-439. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx094.
8
Systematic Review of the Clinical Application of Exposure Techniques to Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Anxiety.暴露技术在社区焦虑老年人群中临床应用的系统评价
Clin Gerontol. 2017 May-Jun;40(3):141-158. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1291546. Epub 2017 Feb 6.