• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preferences for Temporal Sequences of Real Outcomes Differ Across Domains but do not Vary by Age.不同领域的真实结果时间序列的偏好不同,但与年龄无关。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):430-439. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx094.
2
Age Effects in Sequence-Construction for a Continuous Cognitive Task: Similar Sequence-Trends but Fewer Switch-Points.连续认知任务序列构建中的年龄效应:相似的序列趋势但较少的转换点。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Mar 9;75(4):762-771. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby090.
3
Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.额叶、纹状体和内侧颞叶对价值的敏感性在决策过程中区分了冒险型与规避风险型老年人。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12498-12509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-16.2016.
4
Taking the Biggest First: Age Differences in Preferences for Monetary and Hedonic Sequences.优先考虑最大的:货币和享乐序列偏好中的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Aug 21;74(6):964-974. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx160.
5
Risky effort.冒险的努力。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105895. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105895. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
6
Dread sensitivity in decisions about real and imagined electrical shocks does not vary by age.在关于真实和想象中的电击的决策中,恐惧敏感性不会因年龄而有所不同。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Dec;31(8):890-901. doi: 10.1037/pag0000136.
7
Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.年龄对时间偏好的影响:任务类型、结果特征和协变量的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz097.
8
Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.效用函数可预测猴子的方差和偏度风险偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 26;113(30):8402-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602217113. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
10
Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter-individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics.手部运动学分析揭示了跨期决策动态中的个体差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3597-611. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4427-1. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal discounting across adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人时间折扣的研究进展:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Feb;37(1):111-124. doi: 10.1037/pag0000634.
2
Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.年龄对时间偏好的影响:任务类型、结果特征和协变量的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz097.
3
Age Effects in Sequence-Construction for a Continuous Cognitive Task: Similar Sequence-Trends but Fewer Switch-Points.连续认知任务序列构建中的年龄效应:相似的序列趋势但较少的转换点。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Mar 9;75(4):762-771. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby090.
4
Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood.成年期努力、概率和时间贴现过程中的主观价值表现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 May 1;13(5):449-459. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy021.
5
Taking the Biggest First: Age Differences in Preferences for Monetary and Hedonic Sequences.优先考虑最大的:货币和享乐序列偏好中的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Aug 21;74(6):964-974. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx160.

本文引用的文献

1
Age Differences in Self-Continuity: Converging Evidence and Directions for Future Research.自我连续性的年龄差异:趋同证据与未来研究方向。
Gerontologist. 2017 Jun 1;57(3):396-408. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx010.
2
Dread sensitivity in decisions about real and imagined electrical shocks does not vary by age.在关于真实和想象中的电击的决策中,恐惧敏感性不会因年龄而有所不同。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Dec;31(8):890-901. doi: 10.1037/pag0000136.
3
Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards.不同领域决策中的成人年龄差异:对社会和健康相关奖励的贴现增加。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):737-746. doi: 10.1037/pag0000131.
4
Subjective acceleration of time experience in everyday life across adulthood.成年期日常生活中时间体验的主观加速。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Dec;51(12):1824-1839. doi: 10.1037/dev0000059. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer.社会科学。社会科学中的发表偏倚:开启档案柜。
Science. 2014 Sep 19;345(6203):1502-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1255484. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Financial Decision Making and the Aging Brain.金融决策与衰老的大脑
APS Obs. 2013 Jun;26(5):30-33.
7
Who saves the best for last? Age differences in preferences for affective sequences.谁把最好的留到最后?情感序列偏好的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):840-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028747. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
Reduced sensitivity to immediate reward during decision-making in older than younger adults.在决策过程中,老年人对即时奖励的敏感性低于年轻人。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036953. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.年龄差异与冒险选择:一项元分析。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Oct;1235:18-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x.
10
Domain independence and stability in young and older adults' discounting of delayed rewards.年轻人和老年人对延迟奖励折扣中的领域独立性和稳定性
Behav Processes. 2011 Jul;87(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6.

不同领域的真实结果时间序列的偏好不同,但与年龄无关。

Preferences for Temporal Sequences of Real Outcomes Differ Across Domains but do not Vary by Age.

机构信息

Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):430-439. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx094.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbx094
PMID:28977554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377032/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

People's preferences for temporal sequences of events have implications for life-long health and well-being. Prior research suggests that other aspects of intertemporal choice vary by age, but evidence for age differences in sequence-preferences is limited and inconclusive. In response, the present research examined age differences in sequence-preferences for real outcomes administered in a controlled laboratory setting.

METHODS

A pilot study examined sequence-preferences for aversive electrodermal shocks in 30 younger and 30 older adults. The main study examined sequence-preferences for electrodermal shocks, physical effort, and monetary gambles in an adult life-span sample (N = 120). It also examined emotional and physiological responses to sequences as well as underlying mechanisms including time perception and emotion-regulation.

RESULTS

There were no significant age differences in sequence-preferences in either of the studies, and there were no age differences in responses to sequences in the main study. Instead, there was a domain effect with participants preferring decreasing sequences for shocks and mixed sequences for effort and money.

DISCUSSION

After considering potential methodological limitations, theoretical contributions and implications for real-life decisions are discussed.

摘要

目的

人们对事件时间顺序的偏好对终身健康和幸福有影响。先前的研究表明,跨期选择的其他方面因年龄而异,但关于序列偏好的年龄差异的证据有限且不一致。有鉴于此,本研究在受控实验室环境中检查了真实结果的序列偏好的年龄差异。

方法

一项初步研究检查了 30 名年轻成年人和 30 名年长成年人对电击的厌恶的序列偏好。主要研究在成人生命周期样本(N=120)中检查了电击、体力劳动和金钱赌博的序列偏好。它还检查了对序列的情绪和生理反应以及包括时间感知和情绪调节在内的潜在机制。

结果

在这两项研究中,序列偏好都没有显著的年龄差异,并且在主要研究中,对序列的反应也没有年龄差异。相反,存在一个领域效应,参与者更喜欢电击的递减序列,以及努力和金钱的混合序列。

讨论

在考虑了潜在的方法学限制之后,讨论了理论贡献和对现实生活决策的影响。