• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先娱乐后工作:情绪和年龄对日常活动安排的影响。

Pleasure before business: emotions and age effects on daily activity scheduling.

机构信息

Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 31, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Boston University, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44245-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-44245-w
PMID:37875478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10598225/
Abstract

Activity scheduling represents a key process in daily life, involving the evaluation of the costs and benefits of the resources to be invested, but also a preference for when to engage in pleasant or unpleasant activities. Aging affects the evaluation processes and individual preferences due to changes in cognitive functioning and life perspectives. The present study investigated the differences between younger adults (age range 19-33) and older adults (age range 65-87) in a task assessing preferential scheduling of activities. Participants were asked to schedule thirty emotional activities (positive, negative, or neutral) within a 30-day time window, assigning one activity for each day. Results indicated that older adults, but not younger adults, planned positive activities closer in time, supporting the "positivity effect". Also, both younger and older adults tended to postpone negative activities, scheduling them in the last days. Finally, for older adults only, negative affect was associated with the tendency to put positive activities closer in time. Present findings showed age-specific effects of emotional content on daily activity scheduling.

摘要

活动安排代表日常生活中的一个关键过程,涉及对要投入的资源的成本和收益的评估,但也涉及对何时从事愉快或不愉快活动的偏好。由于认知功能和生活观念的变化,衰老会影响评估过程和个人偏好。本研究在一项评估活动偏好安排的任务中,比较了年轻成年人(年龄范围 19-33 岁)和老年人(年龄范围 65-87 岁)之间的差异。参与者被要求在 30 天的时间窗口内安排三十项情绪活动(积极、消极或中性),每天安排一项活动。结果表明,只有老年人而不是年轻人更倾向于将积极的活动安排在更近的时间,这支持了“积极性效应”。此外,年轻成年人和老年人都倾向于将消极活动推迟到最后几天安排。最后,只有老年人的消极情绪与将积极活动安排在更近的时间的倾向有关。目前的研究结果表明,情绪内容对日常活动安排有特定年龄的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b10/10598225/19b2b87b6f05/41598_2023_44245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b10/10598225/52d55289d2e0/41598_2023_44245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b10/10598225/19b2b87b6f05/41598_2023_44245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b10/10598225/52d55289d2e0/41598_2023_44245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b10/10598225/19b2b87b6f05/41598_2023_44245_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pleasure before business: emotions and age effects on daily activity scheduling.先娱乐后工作:情绪和年龄对日常活动安排的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44245-w.
2
A tale of two emotions: The diverging salience and health consequences of calmness and excitement in old age.两种情绪的故事:老年时平静和兴奋的不同显著度和健康后果。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Aug;36(5):626-641. doi: 10.1037/pag0000512.
3
"When did you see it?" The effect of emotional valence on temporal source memory in aging.你何时看到它的?情绪效价对衰老时间源记忆的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Aug;36(5):987-994. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2069683. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
What could go wrong? No evidence of an age-related positivity effect when evaluating outcomes of risky activities.当评估危险活动的结果时,没有证据表明与年龄相关的积极效应会出错。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Aug;55(8):1788-1799. doi: 10.1037/dev0000765. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
Does the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical recall reflect differences in appraisal or memory?自传体回忆中与年龄相关的积极效应反映的是评价差异还是记忆差异?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):548-56. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt047. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Emotional valence impacts lexical activation and inhibition differently in aging: an emotional Hayling task investigation.情绪效价对衰老过程中词汇激活和抑制的影响不同:一项情绪海林任务研究。
Exp Aging Res. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):206-220. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1449587. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
In the ear of the beholder: how age shapes emotion processing in nonverbal vocalizations.在旁观者的耳中:年龄如何塑造非言语发声中的情绪处理。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):145-160. doi: 10.1037/a0034287. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Can older adults resist the positivity effect in neural responding? The impact of verbal framing on event-related brain potentials elicited by emotional images.老年人能否抵制神经反应中的积极性效应?言语框架对情绪图片引发的事件相关脑电位的影响。
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):949-59. doi: 10.1037/a0032771. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Multidimensional model of apathy in older adults using partial least squares--path modeling.使用偏最小二乘路径建模的老年人冷漠多维模型
Age (Dordr). 2016 Jun;38(3):55. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9916-z. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
Eye movements reveal a similar positivity effect in Chinese and UK older adults.眼部运动揭示了中国和英国老年人中类似的积极效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1921-1929. doi: 10.1177/1747021820935861. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of biochemical prostate cancer recurrence from any Gleason score using robust tissue structure and clinically available information.利用稳健的组织结构和临床可用信息预测任何Gleason评分的前列腺癌生化复发情况。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Feb 7;16(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01896-7.

本文引用的文献

1
"When did you see it?" The effect of emotional valence on temporal source memory in aging.你何时看到它的?情绪效价对衰老时间源记忆的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Aug;36(5):987-994. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2069683. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Do the young and the old perceive emotional intervals differently when shown on a younger or older face?年轻人和老年人在观看年轻或年老的面孔时,对情绪间隔的感知是否不同?
Cogn Process. 2021 Nov;22(4):691-699. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01037-2. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach.
重新审视负面偏差:来自神经科学测量和个体差异方法的证据。
Soc Neurosci. 2021 Feb;16(1):68-82. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1696225. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Examining Positivity Effect and Working Memory in Young-Old and Very Old Adults Using EEG-Derived Cognitive State Metrics.使用 EEG 衍生的认知状态指标考察年轻老年人和非常老年人的正性效应和工作记忆。
Res Aging. 2019 Dec;41(10):1014-1035. doi: 10.1177/0164027519865310. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
The Role of Emotional Valence for the Processing of Facial and Verbal Stimuli-Positivity or Negativity Bias?情绪效价在面部和言语刺激加工中的作用——积极偏向还是消极偏向?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01654. eCollection 2019.
6
The positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age.积极效应:年轻人的消极偏见会随着年龄增长而消退。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
Self-generation and positivity effects following transcranial random noise stimulation in medial prefrontal cortex: A reality monitoring task in older adults.内侧前额叶皮层经颅随机噪声刺激后的自我生成与积极效应:一项针对老年人的现实监测任务
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Aging and emotional expressions: is there a positivity bias during dynamic emotion recognition?衰老与情绪表达:动态情绪识别过程中是否存在积极偏向?
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:1130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01130. eCollection 2015.
9
Selective Engagement of Cognitive Resources: Motivational Influences on Older Adults' Cognitive Functioning.选择性利用认知资源:动机对老年人认知功能的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jul;9(4):388-407. doi: 10.1177/1745691614527465.
10
Running with emotion: when affective content hampers working memory performance.带着情绪奔跑:当情感内容阻碍工作记忆表现时。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Mar;50(2):161-4. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12101. Epub 2014 Sep 18.