Suppr超能文献

低细胞量液基宫颈细胞学中细胞密度的准确评估。

Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.

作者信息

Siebers A G, van der Laak J A W M, Huberts-Manders R, Vedder J E M, Bulten J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2013 Aug;24(4):216-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2012.00990.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Scant cellularity is the most important source of unsatisfactory liquid-based cytology. Although still being debated, low cellularity is thought to compromise the detection of squamous lesions. Thus, reliable assessment of cellularity is essential. The aim of the present study was to determine the cellularity range for ThinPrep(®) slides of low cellularity and to establish the most accurate cell-counting protocol.

METHODS

A series of 60 ThinPrep cases representing the full spectrum of adequate, 'satisfactory but limited by' (SBLB) and unsatisfactory reports were included. Two cell-counting protocols with three different magnifications, using ×10, ×20 and ×40 objectives, were evaluated and related to the true cellularity, together with a reassessment of the degree of adequacy originally reported. The cell-counting protocol that showed the highest correlation coefficient was considered the most accurate.

RESULTS

Based on seven (re)assessments a majority score for adequacy was established. There were 42 cases with a majority score 'unsatisfactory' or 'SBLB' (low cellularity) of which 41 contained fewer than 20 000 squamous cells; and 18 cases with a majority score 'satisfactory' of which one had fewer than 20 000 cells. The cell-counting protocol that showed the significantly highest correlation with the reference standard was the Stichting Kwaliteitsbewaking Medische Laboratoriumdiagnostiek (SKML) protocol with a ×10 objective.

CONCLUSIONS

ThinPrep slides reported as unsatisfactory or SBLB were shown to contain fewer than 20000 squamous cells. The most accurate protocol for estimating the cellularity of these slides was cell counting in five non-adjacent microscope fields along the horizontal axis and five along the vertical axis of the slide with a ×10 objective and applying a correction factor of 1.24× to correct for underestimation of the true cellularity.

摘要

目的

细胞数量稀少是液基细胞学检查结果不理想的最重要原因。尽管仍存在争议,但细胞数量少被认为会影响鳞状病变的检测。因此,可靠评估细胞数量至关重要。本研究的目的是确定低细胞数量的ThinPrep(®)玻片的细胞数量范围,并建立最准确的细胞计数方案。

方法

纳入了一系列60例ThinPrep病例,这些病例涵盖了足够、“满意但受限于”(SBLB)和不满意报告的全谱。评估了两种使用×10、×20和×40物镜的具有三种不同放大倍数的细胞计数方案,并将其与真实细胞数量相关联,同时重新评估最初报告的充分程度。相关性系数最高的细胞计数方案被认为是最准确的。

结果

基于七次(重新)评估,确定了充分程度的多数评分。有42例多数评分为“不满意”或“SBLB”(低细胞数量),其中41例鳞状细胞少于20000个;18例多数评分为“满意”,其中1例细胞少于20000个。与参考标准相关性显著最高的细胞计数方案是使用×10物镜的荷兰医学实验室诊断质量控制基金会(SKML)方案。

结论

报告为不满意或SBLB的ThinPrep玻片显示鳞状细胞少于20000个。估计这些玻片细胞数量的最准确方案是使用×10物镜,在玻片横轴的五个不相邻显微镜视野和纵轴的五个不相邻显微镜视野中进行细胞计数,并应用1.24倍的校正因子来校正对真实细胞数量的低估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验