Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jun 18;12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-135.
The vast majority of research in the area of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been based on patients admitted to hospital. And yet, the majority of patients with CAP are treated on an ambulatory basis as outpatients, either by primary care physicians or in Emergency Departments. Few studies have been conducted in outpatients with pneumonia, and there is a paucity of data on short and long term morbidity or mortality and associated clinical correlates in this group of patients.
From 2000-2002, all CAP patients presenting to 7 Emergency Departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada were prospectively enrolled in a population-based registry. Clinical data, including pneumonia severity index (PSI) were collected at time of presentation. Patients discharged to the community were then followed for up to 5 years through linkage to the provincial administrative databases. The current report provides the rationale and design for the cohort, as well as describes baseline characteristics and 30-day morbidity and mortality.
The total sample included 3874 patients. After excluding patients who were hospitalized, died or returned to the Emergency Department the same day they were initially discharged (n = 451; 12 %), and patients who could not be linked to provincial administrative databases (n = 237; 6 %), the final cohort included 3186 patients treated according to a validated clinical management pathway and discharged back to the community. Mean age was 51 (SD = 20) years, 53 % male; 4 % resided in a nursing home, 95 % were independently mobile, and 88 % had mild (PSI class I-III) pneumonia. Within 30-days, return to Emergency Department was common (25 %) as was hospitalization (8 %) and 1 % of patients had died.
To our knowledge, this represents the largest clinically-detailed outpatient CAP cohort assembled to date and will add to our understanding of the determinants and outcomes in this under-researched patient population. The rich clinical data along with the long term health care utilization and mortality will allow for the identification of novel prognostic indicators. Given how under studied this population is, the findings should aid clinicians in the routine care of their outpatients with pneumonia and help define the next generation of research questions.
绝大多数社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的研究都是基于住院患者。然而,大多数 CAP 患者都是在门诊接受治疗,要么是由初级保健医生治疗,要么是在急诊科治疗。很少有针对门诊肺炎患者的研究,并且在这组患者中,关于短期和长期发病率或死亡率以及相关临床相关性的数据也很少。
2000-2002 年,加拿大阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿的 7 家急诊科所有 CAP 患者均前瞻性纳入一项基于人群的登记研究。在就诊时收集临床数据,包括肺炎严重指数(PSI)。然后,通过与省级行政数据库的链接,对出院到社区的患者进行长达 5 年的随访。本报告提供了该队列的原理和设计,并描述了基线特征和 30 天发病率和死亡率。
总样本包括 3874 名患者。排除住院、死亡或出院当天返回急诊科的患者(n=451;12%)以及无法与省级行政数据库关联的患者(n=237;6%)后,最终队列包括 3186 名按照经过验证的临床管理路径治疗并出院回社区的患者。平均年龄为 51(标准差=20)岁,53%为男性;4%居住在养老院,95%能够独立移动,88%患有轻度(PSI Ⅰ-Ⅲ级)肺炎。30 天内,返回急诊科很常见(25%),住院也很常见(8%),1%的患者死亡。
据我们所知,这是迄今为止最大的临床详细门诊 CAP 队列,将有助于我们了解这一研究不足的患者人群的决定因素和结果。丰富的临床数据以及长期的医疗保健利用和死亡率将为确定新的预后指标提供依据。鉴于这一人群的研究不足,研究结果应有助于临床医生常规治疗门诊肺炎患者,并有助于确定下一代研究问题。