Suppr超能文献

医院获得性肺炎和医疗保健相关性肺炎指南:一个弱点、一个陷阱和一个致命缺陷。

Guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and health-care-associated pneumonia: a vulnerability, a pitfall, and a fatal flaw.

机构信息

Special Pathogens Laboratory and Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Mar;11(3):248-52. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70005-6.

Abstract

The 2005 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America's guidelines for pneumonia introduced the new category of health-care-associated pneumonia, which increased the number of people to whom the guidelines for multidrug-resistant pathogens applied. Three fundamental issues inherent in the definition of hospital-acquired pneumonia and health-care-associated pneumonia undermined the credibility of these guidelines and the applicability of their recommendations: a vulnerability, a pitfall, and a fatal flaw. The vulnerability is the extreme heterogeneity of the population of patients. The fatal flaw is the failure to accurately diagnose hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia; inability to distinguish colonisation from infection in respiratory-tract cultures renders the guidelines inherently unstable. The pitfall is spiralling empiricism of antibiotic use for severely ill patients in whom infection might not be present. A vicious circle of antibiotic overuse leading to emergence of resistant microflora can become established, leading to unnecessary use of empirical broad-spectrum combination antibiotics and increased mortality. Controlled studies now show that administration of broad-spectrum combination antibiotic therapy can lead to increased mortality in uninfected patients. Proposed solutions include the use of individualised assessment of patients. Health-care-associated pneumonia should be broken down into several distinct subgroups so narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy can be used. Emphasis should be placed on defining the microbial cause of the pneumonia rather than reflex administration of empirical combination therapy.

摘要

2005 年美国胸科学会和传染病学会的肺炎指南引入了新的医疗保健相关性肺炎类别,这增加了适用多药耐药病原体指南的人群数量。医院获得性肺炎和医疗保健相关性肺炎定义中存在三个固有问题,破坏了这些指南的可信度及其建议的适用性:一个是脆弱性,一个是陷阱,还有一个是致命缺陷。脆弱性是患者人群的极端异质性。致命缺陷是未能准确诊断医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎;无法区分呼吸道培养物中的定植与感染,使得指南本质上不稳定。陷阱是对可能不存在感染的重病患者进行经验性抗生素使用的螺旋式上升。抗生素过度使用导致耐药微生物菌群出现的恶性循环可能会建立起来,导致不必要地使用经验性广谱联合抗生素和增加死亡率。目前的对照研究表明,给予广谱联合抗生素治疗可能会导致未感染患者的死亡率增加。提出的解决方案包括对患者进行个体化评估。医疗保健相关性肺炎应分为几个不同的亚组,以便使用窄谱抗生素治疗。应强调确定肺炎的微生物病因,而不是反射性地给予经验性联合治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验