University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1107-14. doi: 10.3201/eid1807.101638.
After an imported case of Marburg hemorrhagic fever was reported in 2008 in the Netherlands, control measures to prevent transmission were implemented. To evaluate consequences of these measures, we administered a structured questionnaire to 130 contacts classified as either having high-risk or low-risk exposure to body fluids of the case-patient; 77 (59.2%) of 130 contacts responded. A total of 67 (87.0%) of 77 respondents agreed that temperature monitoring and reporting was necessary, significantly more often among high-risk than low-risk contacts (p<0.001). Strict compliance with daily temperature monitoring decreased from 80.5% (62/77) during week 1 to 66.2% (51/77) during week 3. Contacts expressed concern about development of Marburg hemorrhagic fever (58.4%, 45/77) and infecting a family member (40.2%, 31/77). High-risk contacts had significantly higher scores on psychological impact scales (p<0.001) during and after the monitoring period. Public health authorities should specifically address consequences of control measures on the daily life of contacts.
2008 年在荷兰报告了一起马尔堡出血热输入病例后,实施了控制措施以防止传播。为了评估这些措施的后果,我们向 130 名接触者发放了一份结构调查问卷,这些接触者被归类为与病例患者的体液有高风险或低风险接触;130 名接触者中有 77 名(59.2%)做出了回应。共有 77 名答复者中的 67 名(87.0%)同意体温监测和报告是必要的,高风险接触者的这一比例明显高于低风险接触者(p<0.001)。严格遵守每日体温监测的比例从第 1 周的 80.5%(62/77)下降到第 3 周的 66.2%(51/77)。接触者对马尔堡出血热的发展表示担忧(58.4%,45/77)和感染家庭成员(40.2%,31/77)。高风险接触者在监测期间和之后的心理影响量表上的得分明显更高(p<0.001)。公共卫生当局应特别解决控制措施对接触者日常生活的影响。