Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012 Apr;43(2):121-6. doi: 10.1177/1550059411433613. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) guidelines recommend recording P14 between an ipsilateral centroparietal electrode (CPi) and a noncephalic reference, typically the contralateral Erb's point (EPc) (American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 9D: guidelines on short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23(2):168-179). We investigated the utility of a forehead (Fpz)-to-inion derivation for recording P14. We analyzed 74 median nerve somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) studies (148 nerves) with bilaterally normal peripheral and central conductions. The presence of an identifiable P14 and its amplitude and latency were assessed in both the CPi-EPc and Fpz-inion derivations. In 7 of the 148 recordings, P14 was not identifiable in either derivation. The P14 was only identifiable in CPi-EPc in 9 recordings, and only identifiable in Fpz-inion in 4 recordings. In the remaining 128 recordings, the mean P14 latency was 13.2 ± 1.1 ms in both derivations. The mean P14 amplitude using CPi-EPc was 2.0 ± 0.6 µV, significantly larger than that using Fpz-inion, 1.2 ± 0.6 µV (P < .001). In conclusion, the CPi-EPc derivation and the Fpz-inion derivation both record the same P14 component, and latency norms based on either derivation are interchangeable. Although the CPi-EPc derivation typically yields a larger and more identifiable P14, occasionally Fpz-inion yields a larger P14, and rarely P14 is only identifiable using Fpz-inion. Thus, recording of the Fpz-inion derivation may be a useful adjunct during median nerve SEP testing.
美国临床神经生理学学会 (ACNS) 指南建议在同侧中央顶区电极 (CPi) 和非头参考电极之间记录 P14,通常为对侧 Erb 点 (EPc) (美国临床神经生理学学会。指南 9D:短潜伏期体感诱发电位指南。J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23(2):168-179)。我们研究了额(Fpz)-枕骨隆突导联记录 P14 的效用。我们分析了 74 例正中神经体感诱发电位 (SEP) 研究(148 根神经),双侧周围和中枢传导均正常。在 CPi-EPc 和 Fpz-inion 导联中评估了可识别的 P14 及其幅度和潜伏期。在 148 个记录中,有 7 个在两种导联中均无法识别 P14。9 个记录中 P14 仅在 CPi-EPc 中可识别,4 个记录中仅在 Fpz-inion 中可识别。在其余 128 个记录中,两种导联的平均 P14 潜伏期均为 13.2 ± 1.1 ms。CPi-EPc 导联的平均 P14 幅度为 2.0 ± 0.6 µV,显著大于 Fpz-inion 导联的 1.2 ± 0.6 µV(P <.001)。总之,CPi-EPc 导联和 Fpz-inion 导联都记录相同的 P14 成分,基于任何一种导联的潜伏期标准都是可互换的。虽然 CPi-EPc 导联通常产生更大且更可识别的 P14,但偶尔 Fpz-inion 导联会产生更大的 P14,并且很少仅使用 Fpz-inion 导联可识别 P14。因此,在正中神经 SEP 测试期间,记录 Fpz-inion 导联可能是一种有用的辅助手段。