Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4059-64. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4855.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of parentage misidentification on estimation of genetic parameters for the Italian buffalo population for milk yield from 45,194 lactation records of 23,104 Italian buffalo cows. Animals were grouped into 10 data sets in which sires and dams were DNA identified, or reported from the pedigree, or unknown. A derivative-free restricted maximum likelihood method was used to estimate components of variance with a repeatability model. The model contained age at calving nested within parity and days from calving to conception as linear covariates, herd-year-seasons as fixed effects, and additive genetic, permanent environmental, and temporary environmental effects as random effects. Estimates of heritability (±SE) ranged from 0.00 ± 0.099 (sires and dams as reported in the pedigree) to 0.39 ± 0.094 (sires DNA identified and dams as reported in the pedigree). When identification of sires was as reported in the pedigree, estimates of heritability were close to zero. These small estimates indicate that a large proportion of reported paternity is incorrect. When sires are unknown and dams are DNA identified, the proportion of variance due to sires seems to be captured in the estimate of permanent environmental variance as a fraction of phenotypic variance. Therefore, as heritability decreased, permanent environmental variance increased about the same amount. Data sets with dams identified from pedigree and sires DNA identified showed the largest estimate of heritability (0.39), which was essentially the same as when dams were DNA identified (0.38). This result supports that most dams are correctly reported from the pedigree. Genetic progress should be much greater with bulls DNA identified because of greater heritability, but without artificial insemination and progeny testing, progress would be slow and would depend mostly on selection of sires based on dam estimated breeding values. Implementation of artificial insemination programs and DNA testing to identify sires are the keys for increasing genetic progress in the Italian buffalo population.
本研究的目的是评估亲子关系误认对意大利水牛群体产奶量遗传参数估计的影响,数据来源于 23104 头意大利水牛的 45194 个泌乳记录。动物被分为 10 个数据集,其中亲代的父本和母本通过 DNA 鉴定,或从系谱中报告,或未知。采用无导数约束极大似然法,以重复模型估计方差分量。模型包含了年龄和胎次嵌套在产犊日期和配种日期之间的线性协变量,以 herd-year-season 作为固定效应,以加性遗传、永久环境和临时环境效应作为随机效应。遗传力(±SE)的估计值范围从 0.00 ± 0.099(系谱中报告的父本和母本)到 0.39 ± 0.094(DNA 鉴定的父本和系谱中报告的母本)。当父本的身份是在系谱中报告时,遗传力的估计值接近于零。这些较小的估计值表明,大部分报告的父系都是不正确的。当父本未知而母本通过 DNA 鉴定时,由于永久环境方差是表型方差的一部分,所以父本的方差似乎被捕获在永久环境方差的估计中。因此,随着遗传力的降低,永久环境方差的增加量大致相同。来自系谱中鉴定的母本和 DNA 鉴定的父本的数据集显示出最大的遗传力(0.39),这与母本通过 DNA 鉴定时的估计值(0.38)基本相同。这一结果支持了大多数母本都是从系谱中正确报告的。由于遗传力较高,使用 DNA 鉴定的公牛可以获得更大的遗传进展,但如果没有人工授精和后裔测试,进展将缓慢,并且主要取决于基于母本估计育种值选择父本。实施人工授精计划和 DNA 测试来鉴定父本是提高意大利水牛群体遗传进展的关键。