Association of American Universities, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1525-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1223995.
After a decade of intensive policy discussions on the topic of dual-use research of concern (DURC) in the life sciences, there has been a lack of consensus on how to practically define DURC; whether it is feasible to identify and regulate DURC experiments; how to address the risks associated with DURC; and how to balance this risk with the necessity of fostering life sciences research for public health and biodefense. The publication of two avian influenza studies has brought the DURC issue back into sharp focus and has resulted in a new set of federal guidelines. However, the new DURC policy raises questions regarding whether this is the best policy solution to a complicated biosecurity concern.
经过十年关于生命科学两用研究(DURC)这一议题的深入政策讨论,如何实际定义两用研究、是否有可能识别和监管两用研究实验、如何应对与两用研究相关的风险,以及如何在促进公共卫生和生物防御领域的生命科学研究的必要性与平衡这些风险之间,仍然缺乏共识。两份禽流感研究的发表使两用研究问题再次成为焦点,并导致了新的一套联邦指南。然而,新的两用研究政策引发了人们的质疑,即这是否是解决复杂生物安全问题的最佳政策方案。