• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立助产士单位与产科单位:分娩地点的效果是否因社会劣势程度而异?

Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

机构信息

Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 22;12:478. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-478.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-478
PMID:22726575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3434070/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social inequity in perinatal and maternal health is a well-documented health problem even in countries with a high level of social equality. We aimed to study whether the effect of birthplace on perinatal and maternal morbidity, birth interventions and use of pain relief among low risk women intending to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units (FMU) versus two obstetric units in Denmark differed by level of social disadvantage.

METHODS

The study was designed as a cohort study with a matched control group. It included 839 low-risk women intending to give birth in an FMU, who were prospectively and individually matched on nine selected obstetric/socio-economic factors to 839 low-risk women intending OU birth. Educational level was chosen as a proxy for social position. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

Women intending to give birth in an FMU had a significantly higher likelihood of uncomplicated, spontaneous birth with good outcomes for mother and infant compared to women intending to give birth in an OU. The likelihood of intact perineum, use of upright position for birth and water birth was also higher. No difference was found in perinatal morbidity or third/fourth degree tears, while birth interventions including caesarean section and epidural analgesia were significantly less frequent among women intending to give birth in an FMU. In our sample of healthy low-risk women with spontaneous onset of labour at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy, the positive results of intending to give birth in an FMU as compared to an OU were found to hold for both women with post-secondary education and the potentially vulnerable group of FMU women without post-secondary education. In all cases, women without post-secondary education intending to give birth in an FMU had comparable and, in some respects, more favourable outcomes when compared to women with the same level of education intending to give birth in an OU. In this sample of low-risk women, we found that the effect of intended place on birth outcomes did not differ with women's level of education.

CONCLUSION

FMU care appears to offer important benefits for birthing women with no additional risk to the infant. Both for women with and without post-secondary education, intending to give birth in an FMU significantly increased the likelihood of a spontaneous, uncomplicated birth with good outcomes for mother and infant compared to women intending to give birth in an OU. All women should be provided with adequate information about different care models and supported in making an informed decision about the place of birth.

摘要

背景

即使在社会平等程度较高的国家,围产期和产妇健康方面的社会不平等也是一个有据可查的健康问题。我们旨在研究在丹麦的两个独立助产士单位(FMU)与两个产科单位中,出生地点对低危产妇围产期和产妇发病率、分娩干预和使用止痛药物的影响是否因社会劣势程度而不同。

方法

该研究设计为队列研究,设有匹配对照组。它纳入了 839 名有低危妊娠打算在 FMU 分娩的妇女,这些妇女前瞻性地根据 9 项选定的产科/社会经济因素,与 839 名有低危妊娠打算在 OU 分娩的妇女逐一进行匹配。教育水平被选为社会地位的替代指标。分析按意向治疗进行。

结果

与有低危妊娠打算在 OU 分娩的妇女相比,有低危妊娠打算在 FMU 分娩的妇女顺产且母婴结局良好的可能性显著更高。会阴完整、采用直立分娩姿势和水中分娩的可能性也更高。围产期发病率或第三/四级撕裂无差异,而在 FMU 分娩的妇女中,剖宫产和硬膜外镇痛等分娩干预明显较少。在我们的样本中,健康的低危产妇在足月时自然临产,妊娠过程顺利,与有低危妊娠打算在 OU 分娩的妇女相比,打算在 FMU 分娩的妇女的积极结果适用于接受过中学后教育的妇女和 FMU 中没有接受过中学后教育的潜在脆弱群体。在所有情况下,没有接受过中学后教育但有低危妊娠打算在 FMU 分娩的妇女,与具有相同教育水平但有低危妊娠打算在 OU 分娩的妇女相比,具有可比性,在某些方面具有更有利的结局。在这个低危产妇样本中,我们发现,意图分娩地点对分娩结果的影响不因妇女的教育程度而不同。

结论

FMU 护理似乎为分娩妇女带来了重要的益处,对婴儿没有额外的风险。对于接受过中学后教育和没有接受过中学后教育的妇女,与有低危妊娠打算在 OU 分娩的妇女相比,有低危妊娠打算在 FMU 分娩显著增加了自然分娩、无并发症且母婴结局良好的可能性。所有妇女都应获得有关不同护理模式的充分信息,并支持她们就分娩地点做出知情决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312c/3434070/8c81ad946879/1471-2458-12-478-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312c/3434070/8c81ad946879/1471-2458-12-478-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312c/3434070/8c81ad946879/1471-2458-12-478-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?独立助产士单位与产科单位:分娩地点的效果是否因社会劣势程度而异?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 22;12:478. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-478.
2
Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.对于低风险初产妇分娩,独立助产单元是产科单元的安全替代选择吗?一项匹配队列研究中按产次分析效应差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1208-1.
3
Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.独立助产士单位与产科单位:低风险妇女结局的匹配队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000262. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262.
4
A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort.计划性独立助产单元与附属助产单元分娩中按胎次比较产时干预措施及不良结局:对英格兰出生地队列中“低风险”分娩的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1271-2.
5
The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care.出生地对女性分娩体验和护理认知的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(7):973-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
6
Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.苏格兰不同模式产前助产护理与早产率的探索:非匹配回顾性队列分析。
Midwifery. 2015 Jun;31(6):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
Transfers of women planning birth in midwifery units: data from the birthplace prospective cohort study.计划在助产士单位分娩的妇女的转移:来自birthplace 前瞻性队列研究的数据。
BJOG. 2012 Aug;119(9):1081-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03414.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
9
Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.评估助产单元(EMU):澳大利亚新南威尔士州独立助产单元的一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 31;4(10):e006252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252.
10
Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study.在英格兰,计划在家中和独立助产士单位分娩的转移时间和紧迫性:出生地全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 5;13:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-224.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units.分娩诱导经验:英国产科病房产后横断面调查的妇女。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e071703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071703.
2
A true choice of place of birth? Swiss women's access to birth hospitals and birth centers.真正的分娩地点选择?瑞士妇女获得分娩医院和分娩中心的途径。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270834. eCollection 2022.
3
Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.独立助产士主导单位:一项叙述性综述

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care.出生地对女性分娩体验和护理认知的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(7):973-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
2
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.健康低风险孕妇的分娩地点与围产儿和产妇结局:英国Birthplace 前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400.
3
Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Apr 18;25(3):181-188. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_209_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
4
Healing architecture and Snoezelen in delivery room design: a qualitative study of women's birth experiences and patient-centeredness of care.疗愈建筑与送产房中的思乐怡:一项关于女性分娩体验和以患者为中心的护理的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 11;20(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02983-z.
5
Design of Genuine Birth Environment: Midwives Intuitively Think in Terms of Evidence-Based Design Thinking.设计真实的分娩环境:助产士本能地用循证设计思维思考。
HERD. 2019 Apr;12(2):71-86. doi: 10.1177/1937586718796654. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.对于低风险初产妇分娩,独立助产单元是产科单元的安全替代选择吗?一项匹配队列研究中按产次分析效应差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1208-1.
7
Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care.英国伦敦市中心一个新的独立助产单元中女性护理体验调查:2. 护理的具体方面。
Midwifery. 2014 Sep;30(9):1009-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 22.
独立助产士单位与产科单位:低风险妇女结局的匹配队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000262. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262.
4
The relationship between maternal education and mortality among women giving birth in health care institutions: analysis of the cross sectional WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.产妇在医疗机构分娩的死亡率与产妇教育程度的关系:对世界卫生组织全球产妇和围产健康调查的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 29;11:606. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-606.
5
Social and ethnic inequalities in infant mortality: a perspective from the United kingdom.社会和种族不平等与婴儿死亡率:来自英国的观点。
Semin Perinatol. 2011 Aug;35(4):240-4. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.021.
6
Danish registers on aspects of reproduction.丹麦生殖相关登记。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):79-82. doi: 10.1177/1403494811399957.
7
Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women?新西兰计划分娩地点:它是否会影响低风险产妇的分娩方式和干预率?
Birth. 2011 Jun;38(2):111-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00458.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
8
A comparative study of educational inequality in the risk of stillbirth in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden 1981-2000.丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典 1981-2000 年出生缺陷风险的教育不平等比较研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Mar;66(3):240-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.101188. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
9
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.分娩的替代机构环境与传统机构环境
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD000012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub3.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in survival and provision of neonatal care: population based study of very preterm infants.新生儿护理的生存及提供方面的社会经济不平等:基于人群的极早产儿研究
BMJ. 2009 Dec 1;339:b4702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4702.