• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英格兰,计划在家中和独立助产士单位分娩的转移时间和紧迫性:出生地全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。

Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 5;13:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-224.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-13-224
PMID:24314134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4029797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In England, there is a policy of offering healthy women with straightforward pregnancies a choice of birth setting. Options may include home or a freestanding midwifery unit (FMU). Transfer rates from these settings are around 20%, and higher for nulliparous women. The duration of transfer is of interest because of the potential for delay in access to specialist care and is also of concern to women. We aimed to estimate the duration of transfer in births planned at home and in FMUs and explore the effects of distance and urgency on duration.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a national prospective cohort study including 27,842 'low risk' women with singleton, term, 'booked' pregnancies, planning birth in FMUs or at home in England from April 2008 to April 2010. We described transfer duration using the median and interquartile range, for all transfers and those for reasons defined as potentially urgent or non-urgent, and used cumulative distribution curves to compare transfer duration by urgency. We explored the effect of distance for transfers from FMUs and described outcomes in women giving birth within 60 minutes of transfer.

RESULTS

The median overall transfer time, from decision to transfer to first OU assessment, was shorter in transfers from home compared with transfers from FMUs (49 vs 60 minutes; p < 0.001). The median duration of transfers before birth for potentially urgent reasons (home 42 minutes, FMU 50 minutes) was 8-10 minutes shorter compared with transfers for non-urgent reasons. In transfers for potentially urgent reasons, the median overall transfer time from FMUs within 20 km of an OU was 47 minutes, increasing to 55 minutes from FMUs 20-40 km away and 61 minutes in more remote FMUs. In women who gave birth within 60 minutes after transfer, adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in 1-2% of transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfers from home or FMU commonly take up to 60 minutes from decision to transfer, to first assessment in an OU, even for transfers for potentially urgent reasons. Most transfers are not urgent and emergencies and adverse outcomes are uncommon, but urgent transfer is more likely for nulliparous women.

摘要

背景

在英国,政策为简单妊娠的健康女性提供生育环境选择。选择可能包括家庭或独立助产士单位(FMU)。从这些环境中转出的比例约为 20%,而初产妇的比例更高。中转时间是一个关注点,因为可能会延迟获得专科护理,这也是女性关心的问题。我们旨在估计在家中和 FMU 中计划分娩的分娩中转时间,并探讨距离和紧迫性对时间的影响。

方法

这是一项对 2008 年 4 月至 2010 年 4 月在英格兰参加一项全国性前瞻性队列研究的 27842 名单胎、足月、“预订”妊娠、计划在 FMU 或家中分娩的“低风险”女性数据进行的二次分析。我们使用中位数和四分位距描述所有转移和那些被定义为潜在紧急或非紧急转移的转移持续时间,并使用累积分布曲线比较紧急程度的转移持续时间。我们探讨了 FMU 转移的距离效应,并描述了在转移后 60 分钟内分娩的女性的结果。

结果

从决定转移到首次 OU 评估的总转移时间,家中转移的中位数比 FMU 转移的中位数更短(49 分钟比 60 分钟;p<0.001)。对于潜在紧急原因的产前转移持续时间中位数(家庭 42 分钟,FMU 50 分钟)比非紧急原因的转移持续时间中位数短 8-10 分钟。对于潜在紧急原因的转移,距离 OU 20 公里以内的 FMU 的总转移时间中位数为 47 分钟,距离 OU 20-40 公里的 FMU 的转移时间中位数增加到 55 分钟,距离更远的 FMU 的转移时间中位数增加到 61 分钟。在转移后 60 分钟内分娩的女性中,1-2%的转移出现新生儿不良结局。

结论

从决定转移到首次 OU 评估,家中或 FMU 的转移通常需要长达 60 分钟,即使是对于潜在紧急原因的转移也是如此。大多数转移不是紧急的,紧急情况和不良结局很少见,但初产妇更有可能需要紧急转移。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/164c/4029797/36eb09dcec23/1471-2393-13-224-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/164c/4029797/fe30d4b196a2/1471-2393-13-224-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/164c/4029797/36eb09dcec23/1471-2393-13-224-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/164c/4029797/fe30d4b196a2/1471-2393-13-224-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/164c/4029797/36eb09dcec23/1471-2393-13-224-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study.在英格兰,计划在家中和独立助产士单位分娩的转移时间和紧迫性:出生地全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 5;13:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-224.
2
3
A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort.计划性独立助产单元与附属助产单元分娩中按胎次比较产时干预措施及不良结局:对英格兰出生地队列中“低风险”分娩的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1271-2.
4
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.健康低风险孕妇的分娩地点与围产儿和产妇结局:英国Birthplace 前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400.
5
Transfers of women planning birth in midwifery units: data from the birthplace prospective cohort study.计划在助产士单位分娩的妇女的转移:来自birthplace 前瞻性队列研究的数据。
BJOG. 2012 Aug;119(9):1081-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03414.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
6
Immersion in water for pain relief and the risk of intrapartum transfer among low risk nulliparous women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.低风险初产妇水中浸泡缓解疼痛及产时转诊风险:出生地全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 6;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-60.
7
Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.并发症“高风险”女性在家计划分娩与在产科病房分娩的围产期及产妇结局:“出生地”全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):741-53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13283. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.低并发症风险产妇选择替代分娩地点的成本效益:来自英格兰国家前瞻性队列研究的证据。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 18;344:e2292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2292.
9
Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院——时间、频率、原因、紧迫性及结果:评估产科单位研究的一部分
Midwifery. 2015 Sep;31(9):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 5.
10
Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.华盛顿州计划家庭分娩和持照独立分娩中心分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov 1;138(5):693-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004578.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England.产程和产后助产人员配置不足的产科服务重组:英格兰低风险分娩建模。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e051747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051747.
2
Exploring how pregnant women in a remote northern community select a delivery location.探讨偏远北部社区的孕妇如何选择分娩地点。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Jun;68(6):446-451. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6806446.
3
Access to Healthcare for Minors: An Ethical Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model.分娩中心的护理结果:持久模式的证明。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12003. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Women's experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study.女性在分娩期间从助产士单位转移到医院产科单位的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 15;12:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-129.
3
Risk assessment and decision making about in-labour transfer from rural maternity care: a social judgment and signal detection analysis.
未成年人的医疗保健:欧洲人权法院判决的伦理分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;9(10):1361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101361.
4
Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.华盛顿州计划家庭分娩和持照独立分娩中心分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov 1;138(5):693-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004578.
5
Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis.建模出生地成本:路径分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 14;21(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9.
6
Client Experience with the Ontario Birth Center Demonstration Project.客户对安大略生育中心示范项目的体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Mar;66(2):174-184. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13164. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
7
Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.独立助产士主导单位:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Apr 18;25(3):181-188. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_209_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
Outcomes for the First Year of Ontario's Birth Center Demonstration Project.安大略省分娩中心示范项目第一年的成果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Sep 10;63(5):532-40. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12884.
9
The Integration of Ontario Birth Centers into Existing Maternal-Newborn Services: Health Care Provider Experiences.安大略省分娩中心融入现有母婴服务:医疗保健提供者的经验
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Aug 8;63(5):541-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12883.
10
Defining and describing birth centres in the Netherlands - a component study of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.定义和描述荷兰的分娩中心——荷兰分娩中心研究的一项子研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1375-8.
关于从农村产妇保健机构中转至产房的风险评估和决策:社会判断和信号检测分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Oct 31;12:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-122.
4
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.分娩的替代机构环境与传统机构环境
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub4.
5
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.健康低风险孕妇的分娩地点与围产儿和产妇结局:英国Birthplace 前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400.
6
The buck stops here: midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland.责任止于此处:苏格兰农村的助产士和产妇护理。
Midwifery. 2011 Jun;27(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
7
Local guidelines for the transfer of women from midwifery unit to obstetric unit during labour in England: a systematic appraisal of their quality.英国分娩期间产妇从助产单元转至产科单元的当地指南:对其质量的系统评估
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Apr;19(2):90-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030239.
8
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.由注册助产士接生的计划在家分娩与由助产士或医生接生的计划在医院分娩的结局比较。
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
9
Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.1992年至2004年瑞典计划在家分娩与医院分娩的结局。一项基于人群的登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340802199903.
10
Learning from a Rapid Health Impact Assessment of a proposed maternity service reconfiguration in the English NHS.从对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)一项拟议的产科服务重新配置的快速健康影响评估中汲取经验。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 25;8:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-138.