Suppr超能文献

白蛋白紫杉醇对比多西他赛作为转移性乳腺癌一线化疗的 II 期临床试验:总生存的最终分析。

Phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival.

机构信息

Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2012 Oct;12(5):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A randomized phase II study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel. Final survival analyses and updated safety results are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred two patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2) q3w, nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) or 150 mg/m(2) the first 3 of 4 weeks (qw 3/4), or docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w. The trial was powered for analyses of antitumor activity and safety.

RESULTS

Treatment with nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) qw 3/4 resulted in a median overall survival (OS) of 33.8 months compared with 22.2, 27.7, and 26.6 months for nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) qw 3/4, nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2) q3w, and docetaxel, respectively (overall P = .047). Patients receiving 150 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel had prolonged median OS compared with those in the 100 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.575; P = .008). A trend toward a longer OS was noted in the 150 mg/m(2)nab-paclitaxel arm versus docetaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.688). Grade 3 or 4 fatigue, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in all nab-paclitaxel arms compared with docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previously published efficacy results, these data suggest that 150 mg/m(2) qw 3/4 may represent the most clinically efficacious nab-paclitaxel dosing regimen for patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC. A phase III trial confirming these results would be necessary and prudent before widespread adoption of the 150 mg/m(2) dose in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

一项在一线转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中进行的随机 II 期研究表明,与多西他赛相比,每周纳武紫杉醇的疗效和安全性更优。现报道最终生存分析和更新的安全性结果。

患者和方法

302 例未经化疗的 MBC 患者被随机分为三组,分别接受纳武紫杉醇 300 mg/m2,每 3 周一次(q3w);纳武紫杉醇 100 mg/m2 或 150 mg/m2,前 4 周每 3 周一次(qw 3/4);多西他赛 100 mg/m2,每 3 周一次(q3w)。该试验的目的是进行抗肿瘤活性和安全性分析。

结果

纳武紫杉醇 150 mg/m2,qw 3/4 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 33.8 个月,而纳武紫杉醇 100 mg/m2,qw 3/4 组、纳武紫杉醇 300 mg/m2,q3w 组和多西他赛组分别为 22.2、27.7 和 26.6 个月(总 P=0.047)。接受 150 mg/m2 纳武紫杉醇治疗的患者的中位 OS 长于接受 100 mg/m2 纳武紫杉醇治疗的患者(风险比,0.575;P=0.008)。150 mg/m2 纳武紫杉醇组与多西他赛组的 OS 呈延长趋势(风险比,0.688)。所有纳武紫杉醇组的 3 级或 4 级疲劳、中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率均低于多西他赛组。

结论

与之前发表的疗效结果一致,这些数据表明,对于未经化疗的 MBC 患者,150 mg/m2,qw 3/4 可能是最具临床疗效的纳武紫杉醇给药方案。在广泛采用 150 mg/m2 剂量进行临床实践之前,有必要进行并审慎地开展 III 期临床试验以证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验