• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇在癌症治疗中皮肤毒性发生率及风险的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of the incidence and risk of skin toxicity with nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel in cancer treatment.

作者信息

Li Hong-Bo, Wang Wen-Hui, Wang Zhi-Yong

机构信息

Jinhua People's Hospital Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University Jilin 132000, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4279-4290. eCollection 2023.

PMID:37434856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10331690/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin toxicity of varying severity occurs mostly during various courses of chemotherapy. In clinical trials and practice, we have found that both nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel cause side effects such as rash and pruritus. To further clarify the incidence of rash and pruritus in both, we conducted the present study by a systematic evaluation, the results of which can be used to guide clinical dosing choices.

METHODS

An electrical search was performed on randomized controlled research trials of nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel for the treatment of malignancies. The necessary data were extracted, integrated, and analyzed from the included studies by systematic evaluation and meta-analysis, depending on the study design. Further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the incidence of rash and pruritus in nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 971 patients with malignancy were included. Four studies were application of single-agent nab-paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel, and seven studies were comparative chemotherapy drug combinations. The incidence of rash was higher in all grades of nab-paclitaxel than that in paclitaxel (OR=1.39, CI 95% [1.18-1.62]); the incidence of rash was higher in lower grades of paclitaxel than that in solvent-based paclitaxel (OR=1.31, CI 95% [1.11-1.53]); the incidence of rash was higher in all grades in the single-agent application comparison. The incidence of rash was higher in nab-paclitaxel than that in paclitaxel (OR=1.81, CI 95% [1.26-2.59]); there was no significant difference in the incidence of pruritus between nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel (OR=1.19, CI 95% [0.88-1.61]).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel significantly increased the risk of a teething rash. There was a significant risk correlation between nab-paclitaxel and teething rash. Early prevention, identification, and treatment of rash could significantly improve patient's quality of life and optimize their clinical survival.

摘要

背景

不同程度的皮肤毒性大多发生在化疗的各个疗程中。在临床试验和实践中,我们发现纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇和紫杉醇都会引起皮疹和瘙痒等副作用。为进一步明确两者皮疹和瘙痒的发生率,我们通过系统评价开展了本研究,其结果可用于指导临床给药选择。

方法

对纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇和紫杉醇治疗恶性肿瘤的随机对照研究试验进行电子检索。根据研究设计,通过系统评价和荟萃分析从纳入研究中提取、整合并分析必要数据。进行进一步的亚组分析以探讨纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇和紫杉醇皮疹及瘙痒的发生率。

结果

纳入11项研究,共971例恶性肿瘤患者。4项研究为单药纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇的应用比较,7项研究为化疗药物联合方案比较。纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇各等级皮疹发生率均高于紫杉醇(OR = 1.39,95%CI [1.18 - 1.62]);紫杉醇低等级皮疹发生率高于溶剂型紫杉醇(OR = 1.31,95%CI [1.11 - 1.53]);单药应用比较中各等级皮疹发生率均较高。纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇皮疹发生率高于紫杉醇(OR = 1.81,95%CI [1.26 - 2.59]);纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇瘙痒发生率无显著差异(OR = 1.19,95%CI [0.88 - 1.61])。

结论

与紫杉醇相比,纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇显著增加了出牙疹的风险。纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与出牙疹之间存在显著的风险相关性。早期预防、识别和治疗皮疹可显著改善患者生活质量并优化其临床生存期。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of the incidence and risk of skin toxicity with nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel in cancer treatment.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇在癌症治疗中皮肤毒性发生率及风险的荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4279-4290. eCollection 2023.
2
Higher rate of skin rash in a phase II trial with weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin combination in Chinese breast cancer patients.在中国乳腺癌患者中,每周使用纳米白蛋白结合紫杉醇和顺铂联合治疗的Ⅱ期临床试验中皮疹发生率较高。
BMC Cancer. 2013 May 9;13:232. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-232.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.纳武利尤单抗单药化疗转移性乳腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z.
4
Does nab-paclitaxel have a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy than solvent-based paclitaxel? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.纳武利尤单抗对比索拉非尼作为晚期肝细胞癌二线治疗的药物经济学评价:基于 Markov 模型的分析
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Jul;139:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Role of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇在转移性乳腺癌中的作用:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 30;8(42):72950-72958. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18900. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.
6
Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与溶剂型紫杉类药物作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7.
7
Incidence and risk of peripheral neuropathy with nab-paclitaxel in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗癌症患者时外周神经病变的发生率及风险:一项荟萃分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Sep;26(5). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12407. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with conventional taxanes in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇纳米粒与传统紫杉类药物治疗乳腺癌女性患者的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;11(7):2382-2394. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-690.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇对比溶剂型紫杉醇用于早期乳腺癌新辅助化疗(GeparSepto-GBG 69):一项随机、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):345-356. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00542-2. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological Nanocarriers in Cancer Therapy: Cutting Edge Innovations in Precision Drug Delivery.癌症治疗中的生物纳米载体:精准给药的前沿创新
Biomolecules. 2025 May 31;15(6):802. doi: 10.3390/biom15060802.
2
Proteomic analysis of dorsal root ganglia in a mouse model of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain.紫杉醇诱导神经病理性疼痛小鼠模型背根神经节的蛋白质组学分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0306498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306498. eCollection 2024.
3
Incidence and prognosis of taxane-induced macular edema: a retrospective study from the Japan Clinical REtina Study Group (J-CREST).紫杉烷类药物引起的黄斑水肿的发生率和预后:来自日本临床视网膜研究组(J-CREST)的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69775-9.
4
Proteomic Analysis of Dorsal Root Ganglia in a Mouse Model of Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathic Pain.紫杉醇诱导的神经性疼痛小鼠模型中背根神经节的蛋白质组学分析
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 25:2024.06.20.599888. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.20.599888.
5
Keratinocyte Piezo1 drives paclitaxel-induced mechanical hypersensitivity.角质形成细胞Piezo1驱动紫杉醇诱导的机械性超敏反应。
bioRxiv. 2023 Dec 13:2023.12.12.571332. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.12.571332.

本文引用的文献

1
Are we closer to being able to select patients with node-positive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who can safely omit chemotherapy?我们是否更接近于能够挑选出那些可以安全地省略化疗的淋巴结阳性、激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者?
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Mar 26;14:17588359221084769. doi: 10.1177/17588359221084769. eCollection 2022.
2
Dermatological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations of anticancer therapies: a systematic review.基于免疫检查点抑制剂的抗癌疗法联合用药相关的皮肤不良事件:一项系统综述
Immunotherapy. 2022 Apr;14(6):489-503. doi: 10.2217/imt-2021-0244. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.淋巴结阳性和高危淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者接受含贝伐珠单抗和不含贝伐珠单抗的辅助化疗后的生活质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220254. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0254.
4
Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial.曲美替尼对比标准治疗用于复发性低级别浆液性卵巢癌患者(GOG 281/LOGS):一项国际性、随机、开放标签、多中心、2/3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):541-553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9.
5
Emerging nanomedicines of paclitaxel for cancer treatment.紫杉醇类新兴纳米药物治疗癌症。
J Control Release. 2022 Feb;342:280-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Nivolumab with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合卡铂、紫杉醇和贝伐珠单抗用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1137-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
Atezolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Long-term Overall Survival and Safety Update from the Phase 3 IMvigor211 Clinical Trial.阿替利珠单抗与化疗用于铂类治疗后局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者:来自 III 期 IMvigor211 临床试验的长期总生存和安全性更新。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与溶剂型紫杉类药物作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7.
9
Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.勘误:《2018年全球癌症统计数据:全球癌症观察站对185个国家36种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313. doi: 10.3322/caac.21609. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
Is nab-paclitaxel better than conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? A meta-analysis.与传统紫杉烷类药物相比,纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗效果更好吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520943473. doi: 10.1177/0300060520943473.