Falleur D
Department of Allied Health Sciences, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos 78666-4616.
J Allied Health. 1990 Fall;19(4):313-24.
Educators in the health sciences are concerned about academic dishonesty and are searching for methods to control misconduct. If students falsify academic work, their behavior pattern may continue in professional practice, endangering the health and well-being of the patients in their care. This paper presents the results of a study of the attitudes and experiences regarding dishonest academic behaviors of a sample of 244 students and 31 faculty in the School of Health Professions at Southwest Texas State University. Student and faculty definitions of dishonest behavior were compared, and the incidence of dishonest behavior and the experiences of faculty in recognizing and disciplining students for academic misconduct were analyzed. Major findings included: 1) faculty, undergraduate, and graduate students differ in their definitions of some types of dishonest behavior; and 2) the most common types of dishonest behavior identified by faculty and students involve cheating and plagiarism. Future research is warranted with attention given to the causal factors leading to academic dishonesty and patterns of dishonesty in academic and practice settings.
健康科学领域的教育工作者担心学术不诚实行为,并正在寻找控制不当行为的方法。如果学生伪造学术成果,他们的行为模式可能会在专业实践中持续下去,危及他们所护理患者的健康和福祉。本文呈现了对西南德克萨斯州立大学健康职业学院244名学生和31名教师样本关于学术不诚实行为的态度和经历的研究结果。比较了学生和教师对不诚实行为的定义,并分析了不诚实行为的发生率以及教师识别和惩戒学生学术不当行为的经历。主要研究结果包括:1)教师、本科生和研究生对某些类型不诚实行为的定义存在差异;2)教师和学生所认定的最常见不诚实行为类型包括作弊和抄袭。鉴于导致学术不诚实行为的因果因素以及学术和实践环境中的不诚实行为模式,未来的研究很有必要。