Carvalho Alexandre Xavier Ywata de, Silva Gabriela Drummond Marques da, Almeida Júnior Gilberto Rezende de, Albuquerque Pedro Henrique Melo de
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2012 Jul;28(7):1249-62. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012000700004.
This study analyzes homicide incidence per municipality (county) in Brazil in the year 2008. The authors estimate and compare homicide rates according to different methods, finding evidence that depending on the method employed, the results can differ significantly, especially for small municipalities. Bayesian spatial procedures were employed, allowing minimization of variation in the rate estimates. The methods consider a priori distributions and information on contiguity of municipalities. According to the findings, the impact of corrective procedures is not relevant for large municipalities, but such estimates present significant differences for small municipalities. Comparing the different estimates, the authors conclude that there may be distortions in the rates published in the literature. To overcome such potential distortions, it is necessary to take the main goal in each analysis into account. When the emphasis is on overall visualization of the homicide phenomenon, the best option is spatial corrections. However, to obtain more accurate local estimates, Bayesian methods are more appropriate.
本研究分析了2008年巴西各市政当局(县)的杀人案件发生率。作者根据不同方法估算并比较了杀人案件发生率,发现证据表明,根据所采用的方法不同,结果可能存在显著差异,尤其是对于小型市政当局而言。采用了贝叶斯空间程序,以使发生率估计值的变化最小化。这些方法考虑了先验分布以及市政当局相邻关系的信息。根据研究结果,校正程序对大型市政当局的影响不大,但此类估计值在小型市政当局中存在显著差异。通过比较不同的估计值,作者得出结论,文献中公布的发生率可能存在偏差。为了克服这种潜在偏差,有必要考虑每项分析的主要目标。当重点是杀人现象的整体可视化时,最佳选择是空间校正。然而,为了获得更准确的局部估计值,贝叶斯方法更为合适。