Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19012, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jul-Aug;30(4):431-47. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2016. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model describes the importance of targeting criminogenic needs through planned interventions in order to reduce the risk of future offending behavior. Although risk/needs instruments capture these dynamic risk factors and previous research has demonstrated their sensitivity to change in these domains, correctional programs may not be leveraging the full case management potential of these instruments. This study explored the potential for improvements in criminogenic needs through participation in a brief, structured re-entry program consistent with the principles of RNR. Four criminogenic needs were identified as having the potential to change during the course of this program: education/employment, family/marital, procriminal attitudes/orientation, and antisocial pattern. The results indicated that overall risk level significantly decreased during the course of the treatment program, as did risk level for each of these criminogenic needs. For three of these domains, the participants in the highest risk category experienced significant improvements, consistent with the risk principle of RNR. Implications for the interface between assessment and treatment planning are discussed.
风险-需求-反应性(RNR)模型描述了通过有计划的干预来针对犯罪倾向需求的重要性,以减少未来犯罪行为的风险。尽管风险/需求工具捕捉到了这些动态风险因素,并且先前的研究已经证明了它们在这些领域变化的敏感性,但矫正计划可能没有充分利用这些工具的全面案例管理潜力。本研究通过参与一个简短的、符合 RNR 原则的结构化再入计划,探讨了通过参与该计划来改善犯罪倾向需求的潜力。确定了四个有潜力在该计划过程中发生变化的犯罪倾向需求领域:教育/就业、家庭/婚姻、犯罪倾向态度/取向和反社会模式。结果表明,在治疗计划过程中,总体风险水平显著降低,每个犯罪倾向需求的风险水平也都降低了。在这三个领域中,风险最高类别的参与者经历了显著的改善,符合 RNR 的风险原则。讨论了评估和治疗计划之间的接口的影响。