Department of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Bioinformatics, The University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States.
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jul 23;52(7):1821-32. doi: 10.1021/ci3000997. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
Molecular docking is widely used to obtain binding modes and binding affinities of a molecule to a given target protein. Despite considerable efforts, however, prediction of both properties by docking remains challenging mainly due to protein's structural flexibility and inaccuracy of scoring functions. Here, an integrated approach has been developed to improve the accuracy of binding mode and affinity prediction and tested for small molecule MDM2 and MDMX antagonists. In this approach, initial candidate models selected from docking are subjected to equilibration MD simulations to further filter the models. Free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations are then applied to the filtered ligand models to enhance the ability in predicting the near-native ligand conformation. The calculated binding free energies for MDM2 complexes are overestimated compared to experimental measurements mainly due to the difficulties in sampling highly flexible apo-MDM2. Nonetheless, the FEP/MD binding free energy calculations are more promising for discriminating binders from nonbinders than docking scores. In particular, the comparison between the MDM2 and MDMX results suggests that apo-MDMX has lower flexibility than apo-MDM2. In addition, the FEP/MD calculations provide detailed information on the different energetic contributions to ligand binding, leading to a better understanding of the sensitivity and specificity of protein-ligand interactions.
分子对接被广泛用于获取分子与给定靶标蛋白的结合模式和结合亲和力。然而,尽管付出了相当大的努力,对接预测这两种性质仍然具有挑战性,主要原因是蛋白质的结构灵活性和评分函数的不准确性。在这里,开发了一种集成方法来提高结合模式和亲和力预测的准确性,并针对小分子 MDM2 和 MDMX 拮抗剂进行了测试。在这种方法中,从对接中选择的初始候选模型经过平衡 MD 模拟进一步筛选模型。然后将自由能微扰分子动力学(FEP/MD)模拟应用于过滤后的配体模型,以增强预测近天然配体构象的能力。与实验测量相比,计算得到的 MDM2 复合物的结合自由能被高估,主要是由于高度灵活的 apo-MDM2 采样困难。尽管如此,FEP/MD 结合自由能计算在区分配体与非配体方面比对接评分更有前途。特别是,MDM2 和 MDMX 结果的比较表明,apo-MDMX 的灵活性低于 apo-MDM2。此外,FEP/MD 计算提供了有关配体结合的不同能量贡献的详细信息,从而更好地理解了蛋白质-配体相互作用的敏感性和特异性。