Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;19(4):237-43. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.006.
At the 2010 Conference on Living Kidney Donor follow-up, a workgroup was convened to comment on the state of the evidence in 4 broad areas: (a) health-related quality of life postdonation; (b) donors' financial and economic concerns; (c) outcomes issues specific to newer areas of donation, namely, kidney exchange and anonymous (directed and nondirected) donation; and (d) the role of informed consent in relation to postdonation psychosocial outcomes. The workgroup sought to offer recommendations regarding research priorities for the next decade and data collection strategies to accomplish the needed research. The workgroup concluded that there has been little consideration of the nature or predictors of any long-term psychosocial outcomes in living donors. In some areas (eg, kidney exchange and anonymous donation), there is limited information on outcomes even in the early aftermath of donation. Across all 4 psychosocial areas, prospective studies are needed that follow donors to examine the course of development and/or resolution of any donation-related difficulties. The formation of a national registry to routinely collect psychosocial follow-up data may be an efficient strategy to monitor donor outcomes in both the short- and long-term years after donation.
在 2010 年活体肾脏捐献者随访会议上,一个工作组被召集来对以下 4 个广泛领域的证据状况进行评论:(a) 捐赠后的健康相关生活质量;(b) 捐赠者的财务和经济问题;(c) 与新的捐赠领域相关的特定结果问题,即肾脏交换和匿名(定向和非定向)捐赠;(d) 知情同意在与捐赠后心理社会结果的关系中的作用。该工作组旨在就下一个十年的研究重点和数据收集策略提出建议,以完成所需的研究。工作组得出的结论是,对于活体捐献者的任何长期心理社会结果的性质或预测因素,几乎没有考虑。在某些领域(例如肾脏交换和匿名捐赠),即使在捐赠后不久,关于结果的信息也很有限。在所有 4 个心理社会领域,都需要进行前瞻性研究,以跟踪观察捐赠者,检查任何与捐赠相关的困难的发展和/或解决过程。建立一个国家登记处,定期收集心理社会随访数据,可能是监测捐赠后短期和长期内供者结果的一种有效策略。