School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2021 Oct;26(4):436-440. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1879698. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Understanding the multi-dimensional risk beliefs of agricultural audiences allows risk communicators and educators to target those beliefs to improve practices. This study was designed to assess pesticide risk beliefs among English-speaking farmers and Spanish-speaking farmworkers and to compare their beliefs. The Pesticide Risk Beliefs Inventory (PRiBI) is a 19-item quantitative instrument used to assess the alignment of risk beliefs with those beliefs of experts in the field. A higher score on the PRiBI relates to an agreement with expert beliefs regarding pesticide risk. Farmers' and farmworkers' scores were signficiantly different on items corresponding to the use of physical properties to determine risk and specific adverse health outcomes associated with pesticide exposure. With an understanding that farmworkers rely on the physical properties of pesticides to assess risk, educators and farmers can encourage more reliable ways to assess pesticide hazards.
了解农业受众的多维风险信念,使风险沟通者和教育工作者能够针对这些信念进行干预,以改善实践。本研究旨在评估讲英语的农民和讲西班牙语的农场工人的农药风险信念,并比较他们的信念。农药风险信念量表(PRiBI)是一种 19 项的定量工具,用于评估风险信念与该领域专家信念的一致性。PRiBI 的得分越高,与专家关于农药风险的信念的一致性就越高。农民和农场工人在与使用物理性质来确定风险和与农药接触相关的特定不良健康后果相关的项目上的得分存在显著差异。了解到农场工人依靠农药的物理性质来评估风险,教育工作者和农民可以鼓励更可靠的方法来评估农药危害。