• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人和自行车调查(PABS)方法的可靠性测试。

Reliability testing of the Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS) method.

机构信息

Dept of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jul;9(5):677-88. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.5.677.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.9.5.677
PMID:22733872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS) is a questionnaire designed to be economical and straightforward to administer so that it can be used by local governments interested in measuring the amount and purposes of walking and cycling in their communities. In addition, it captures key sociodemographic characteristics of those participating in these activities.

METHODS

In 2009 and 2010 results from the 4-page mail-out/mail-back PABS were tested for reliability across 2 administrations (test-retest reliability). Two versions--early and refined--were tested separately with 2 independent groups of university students from 4 universities (N = 100 in group 1; N = 87 in group 2). Administrations were 7 to 9 days apart.

RESULTS

Almost all survey questions achieved adequate to excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Transportation surveys have not typically been tested for reliability making the PABS questionnaire an important new option for improving information collection about travel behavior, particularly walking and cycling.

摘要

背景

行人与自行车出行调查(PABS)是一份问卷,旨在经济、直接地管理,以便对当地政府有兴趣测量其社区内步行和骑自行车出行的数量和目的时使用。此外,它还可以捕获参与这些活动的人的关键社会人口统计学特征。

方法

在 2009 年和 2010 年,对 4 页的邮寄/回邮 PABS 结果进行了两次测试(重测信度)。两个版本——早期版本和精炼版本——分别在来自四所大学的两组独立大学生(第 1 组 100 人;第 2 组 87 人)中进行了测试。两次测试的间隔为 7 至 9 天。

结果

几乎所有的调查问题都达到了良好到优秀的可靠性。

结论

交通调查通常没有进行可靠性测试,因此 PABS 问卷是改善有关出行行为,特别是步行和骑自行车出行信息收集的一个重要新选择。

相似文献

1
Reliability testing of the Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS) method.行人和自行车调查(PABS)方法的可靠性测试。
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jul;9(5):677-88. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.5.677.
2
Reliability and validity of the Safe Routes to school parent and student surveys.《学校安全出行家长和学生调查问卷的信度和效度》。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun 8;8:56. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-56.
3
Active Travel Behavior in a Border Region of Texas and New Mexico: Motivators, Deterrents, and Characteristics.德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州边境地区的主动出行行为:动机、阻碍因素及特征
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Aug;14(8):636-645. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0503. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Validity of instruments to assess students' travel and pedestrian safety.评估学生出行和步行安全的工具的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 18;10:257. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-257.
5
Validity and reliability of a school travel survey.一项学校出行调查的有效性和可靠性。
J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-15. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s1.
6
Access to pedestrian roads, daily activities, and physical performance of adolescents.青少年使用人行道的情况、日常活动及身体机能。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1965-72. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00016.
7
Test-retest reliability of transport-related physical activity performed during the lifetime.一生中进行的与交通相关的体力活动的重测信度。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jul;10(5):626-31. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.5.626. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
8
Increasing active travel: results of a quasi-experimental study of an intervention to encourage walking and cycling.促进积极出行:鼓励步行和骑行的干预措施的准实验研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Dec;69(12):1184-90. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205466. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Estimating walking and bicycling in Canada and their road collision fatality risks: The need for a national household travel survey.评估加拿大的步行和骑自行车情况及其道路碰撞致死风险:开展全国家庭出行调查的必要性。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Mar 26;22:101366. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101366. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
The contribution of travel-related urban zones, cycling and pedestrian networks and green space to commuting physical activity among adults - a cross-sectional population-based study using geographical information systems.与出行相关的城市区域、自行车和行人网络以及绿地对成年人通勤体力活动的贡献——一项基于人群的横断面研究,采用地理信息系统
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3264-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between bicycle commuting and perceived stress: a cross-sectional study.自行车通勤与感知压力之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e013542. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013542.
2
Examining Associations of Environmental Characteristics with Recreational Cycling Behaviour by Street-Level Strava Data.利用街道层面的Strava数据研究环境特征与休闲骑行行为之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 15;14(6):644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060644.
3
Utilizing Crowdsourced Data for Studies of Cycling and Air Pollution Exposure: A Case Study Using Strava Data.
利用众包数据进行骑行与空气污染暴露研究:一项使用Strava数据的案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 8;14(3):274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030274.