Avila-Palencia Ione, de Nazelle Audrey, Cole-Hunter Tom, Donaire-Gonzalez David, Jerrett Michael, Rodriguez Daniel A, Nieuwenhuijsen Mark J
ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e013542. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013542.
Active commuting - walking and bicycling for travel to and/or from work or educational addresses - may facilitate daily, routine physical activity. Several studies have investigated the relationship between active commuting and commuting stress; however, there are no studies examining the relationship between solely bicycle commuting and perceived stress, or studies that account for environmental determinants of bicycle commuting and stress. The current study evaluated the relationship between bicycle commuting, among working or studying adults in a dense urban setting, and perceived stress.
A cross-sectional study was performed with 788 adults who regularly travelled to work or study locations (excluding those who only commuted on foot) in Barcelona, Spain. Participants responded to a comprehensive telephone survey concerning their travel behaviour from June 2011 through to May 2012. Participants were categorised as either bicycle commuters or non-bicycle commuters, and (based on the Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-4) as either stressed or non-stressed. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust variance models of stress status based on exposures with bicycle commuting were estimated and adjusted for potential confounders.
Bicycle commuters had significantly lower risk of being stressed than non-bicycle commuters (Relative Risk; RR (95% CI)=0.73 (0.60 to 0.89), p=0.001). Bicycle commuters who bicycled 4 days per week (RR (95% CI)=0.42 (0.24 to 0.73), p=0.002) and those who bicycled 5 or more days per week (RR (95% CI)=0.57 (0.42 to 0.77), p<0.001) had lower risk of being stressed than those who bicycled less than 4 days. This relationship remained statistically significant after adjusting for individual and environmental confounders and when using different cut-offs of perceived stress.
Stress reduction may be an important consequence of routine bicycle use and should be considered by decision makers as another potential benefit of its promotion.
主动通勤——步行或骑自行车上下班或往返于教育机构——可能有助于日常的常规体育活动。多项研究调查了主动通勤与通勤压力之间的关系;然而,尚无研究探讨单纯骑自行车通勤与感知压力之间的关系,也没有研究考虑骑自行车通勤和压力的环境决定因素。本研究评估了在人口密集的城市环境中,工作或学习的成年人骑自行车通勤与感知压力之间的关系。
对788名经常往返于西班牙巴塞罗那工作或学习地点(不包括仅步行通勤者)的成年人进行了一项横断面研究。参与者在2011年6月至2012年5月期间通过电话接受了一项关于其出行行为的综合调查。参与者被分为骑自行车通勤者或非骑自行车通勤者,并(根据感知压力量表,PSS - 4)分为有压力或无压力。基于骑自行车通勤暴露情况,采用稳健方差模型的多变量泊松回归对压力状态进行估计,并对潜在混杂因素进行调整。
骑自行车通勤者比非骑自行车通勤者压力大的风险显著更低(相对风险;RR(95%CI)=0.73(0.60至0.89),p = 0.001)。每周骑自行车4天的通勤者(RR(95%CI)=0.42(0.24至0.73),p = 0.002)和每周骑自行车5天或更多天的通勤者(RR(95%CI)=0.57(0.42至0.77),p<0.001)比每周骑自行车少于4天的通勤者压力大的风险更低。在调整个体和环境混杂因素后,以及使用不同的感知压力临界值时,这种关系在统计学上仍然显著。
减轻压力可能是日常骑自行车的一个重要结果,决策者应将其视为推广骑自行车的另一个潜在益处。