• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上的社会认知:测试社会网络规模的限制。

Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2192-201. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0121.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2012.0121
PMID:22734062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3385686/
Abstract

The social brain hypothesis (an explanation for the evolution of brain size in primates) predicts that humans typically cannot maintain more than 150 relationships at any one time. The constraint is partly cognitive (ultimately determined by some aspect of brain volume) and partly one of time. Friendships (but not necessarily kin relationships) are maintained by investing time in them, and failure to do so results in an inexorable deterioration in the quality of a relationship. The Internet, and in particular the rise of social networking sites (SNSs), raises the possibility that digital media might allow us to circumvent some or all of these constraints. This allows us to test the importance of these constraints in limiting human sociality. Although the recency of SNSs means that there have been relatively few studies, those that are available suggest that, in general, the ability to broadcast to many individuals at once, and the possibilities this provides in terms of continuously updating our understanding of network members' behaviour and thoughts, do not allow larger networks to be maintained. This may be because only relatively weak quality relationships can be maintained without face-to-face interaction.

摘要

社会脑假说(解释灵长类动物大脑大小进化的理论)预测,人类通常一次无法维持超过 150 种关系。这种限制部分是认知上的(最终由大脑体积的某个方面决定),部分是时间上的。通过投入时间来维持友谊(但不一定是亲属关系),否则会导致关系质量不可避免地恶化。互联网,尤其是社交网络(SNS)的兴起,提出了数字媒体可能使我们绕过这些限制的部分或全部的可能性。这使我们能够测试这些限制在限制人类社交性方面的重要性。尽管 SNS 出现的时间相对较短,但现有的研究表明,一般来说,一次向多个个体广播的能力,以及这在不断更新我们对网络成员行为和想法的理解方面提供的可能性,并不允许维持更大的网络。这可能是因为如果没有面对面的互动,只能维持相对较弱的关系。

相似文献

1
Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size.互联网上的社会认知:测试社会网络规模的限制。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2192-201. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0121.
2
How the size and structure of egocentric networks change during a life transition.自我中心网络的大小和结构如何在人生转变中发生变化。
Adv Life Course Res. 2024 Sep;61:100632. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2024.100632. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Taking sociality seriously: the structure of multi-dimensional social networks as a source of information for individuals.认真对待社会性:多维社交网络结构作为个体信息源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2108-18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0113.
4
The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution.社会脑假说及其对社会进化的影响。
Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Sep-Oct;36(5):562-72. doi: 10.1080/03014460902960289.
5
Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?在线社交媒体是否突破了限制线下社交网络规模的约束?
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 20;3(1):150292. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150292. eCollection 2016 Jan.
6
Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites.社交网站上的信息共享和关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Aug;16(8):582-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0392. Epub 2013 May 9.
7
Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking.女性青睐二元关系,而男性更喜欢俱乐部:来自社交网络的跨文化证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0118329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118329. eCollection 2015.
8
Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks.交友、即时通讯和面对面交往:青少年线上和线下社交网络的重叠。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):356-68. doi: 10.1037/a0026980.
9
Social networks and infectious diseases prevention behavior: A cross-sectional study in people aged 40 years and older.社交网络与传染病预防行为:一项针对 40 岁及以上人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251862. eCollection 2021.
10
Social networks: Better together.社交网络:携手共进更美好。
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):S14-5. doi: 10.1038/531S14a.

引用本文的文献

1
Suicidality and self-injurious behavior among adolescent social media users at psychiatric hospitalization.青少年社交媒体使用者在精神科住院期间的自杀意念和自伤行为。
CNS Spectr. 2021 Jun;26(3):275-281. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920001108. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet.选择性接触塑造了 Facebook 的新闻资讯获取习惯。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229129. eCollection 2020.
3
Social network analysis of the biblical Moses.对圣经中摩西的社会网络分析。
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s41109-016-0012-1. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
4
Two types of social grooming methods depending on the trade-off between the number and strength of social relationships.根据社会关系的数量和强度之间的权衡,存在两种社会梳理方式。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):180148. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180148. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age.数字时代的线上亲密关系与幸福感。
Internet Interv. 2016 Jun 16;4:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.005. eCollection 2016 May.
6
Internet Use and Access, Behavior, Cyberbullying, and Grooming: Results of an Investigative Whole City Survey of Adolescents.互联网使用与接入、行为、网络欺凌及诱骗:一项针对全市青少年的调查结果
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Aug 29;6(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6231.
7
Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?在线社交媒体是否突破了限制线下社交网络规模的约束?
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 20;3(1):150292. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150292. eCollection 2016 Jan.
8
Neural connections foster social connections: a diffusion-weighted imaging study of social networks.神经连接促进社会联系:一项关于社交网络的扩散加权成像研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 May;11(5):721-7. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv153. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
9
Higher-Order Mentalising and Executive Functioning.高阶心理理论与执行功能
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Nov 1;86:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.021.
10
Geographies of an Online Social Network.一个在线社交网络的地域分布
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137248. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Social network size in humans.人类的社交网络规模。
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
2
Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution.蜂蜜、哈扎人、狩猎采集者与人类进化
J Hum Evol. 2014 Jun;71:119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
3
Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups.自由形成的会话群体的规模和结构。
Hum Nat. 1995 Mar;6(1):67-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02734136.
4
Altruism in social networks: evidence for a 'kinship premium'.社交网络中的利他主义:“亲缘溢价”的证据。
Br J Psychol. 2013 May;104(2):283-95. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02119.x. Epub 2012 May 24.
5
Is the social brain theory applicable to human individual differences? Relationship between sociability personality dimension and brain size.社会脑理论适用于人类个体差异吗?社交性人格维度与脑容量之间的关系。
Evol Psychol. 2011 Jun 17;9(2):244-56. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900211.
6
The role of metacognition in human social interactions.元认知在人类社会互动中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0123.
7
Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum.具身认知进化与小脑。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2097-107. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0112.
8
Is Dunbar's number up?邓巴数理论是否已过时?
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):174-6; discussion 180-2. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02075.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Relationships and the social brain: integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives.关系与社会大脑:整合心理学和进化观点。
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):149-68. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02061.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
10
Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans.眶额前额皮质体积预测社交网络规模:人类个体差异的影像学研究。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jun 7;279(1736):2157-62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2574. Epub 2012 Feb 1.