Suppr超能文献

互联网上的社会认知:测试社会网络规模的限制。

Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2192-201. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0121.

Abstract

The social brain hypothesis (an explanation for the evolution of brain size in primates) predicts that humans typically cannot maintain more than 150 relationships at any one time. The constraint is partly cognitive (ultimately determined by some aspect of brain volume) and partly one of time. Friendships (but not necessarily kin relationships) are maintained by investing time in them, and failure to do so results in an inexorable deterioration in the quality of a relationship. The Internet, and in particular the rise of social networking sites (SNSs), raises the possibility that digital media might allow us to circumvent some or all of these constraints. This allows us to test the importance of these constraints in limiting human sociality. Although the recency of SNSs means that there have been relatively few studies, those that are available suggest that, in general, the ability to broadcast to many individuals at once, and the possibilities this provides in terms of continuously updating our understanding of network members' behaviour and thoughts, do not allow larger networks to be maintained. This may be because only relatively weak quality relationships can be maintained without face-to-face interaction.

摘要

社会脑假说(解释灵长类动物大脑大小进化的理论)预测,人类通常一次无法维持超过 150 种关系。这种限制部分是认知上的(最终由大脑体积的某个方面决定),部分是时间上的。通过投入时间来维持友谊(但不一定是亲属关系),否则会导致关系质量不可避免地恶化。互联网,尤其是社交网络(SNS)的兴起,提出了数字媒体可能使我们绕过这些限制的部分或全部的可能性。这使我们能够测试这些限制在限制人类社交性方面的重要性。尽管 SNS 出现的时间相对较短,但现有的研究表明,一般来说,一次向多个个体广播的能力,以及这在不断更新我们对网络成员行为和想法的理解方面提供的可能性,并不允许维持更大的网络。这可能是因为如果没有面对面的互动,只能维持相对较弱的关系。

相似文献

1
6
Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites.社交网站上的信息共享和关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Aug;16(8):582-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0392. Epub 2013 May 9.
10
Social networks: Better together.社交网络:携手共进更美好。
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):S14-5. doi: 10.1038/531S14a.

引用本文的文献

2
Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet.选择性接触塑造了 Facebook 的新闻资讯获取习惯。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229129. eCollection 2020.
3
Social network analysis of the biblical Moses.对圣经中摩西的社会网络分析。
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s41109-016-0012-1. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age.数字时代的线上亲密关系与幸福感。
Internet Interv. 2016 Jun 16;4:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.005. eCollection 2016 May.
9
Higher-Order Mentalising and Executive Functioning.高阶心理理论与执行功能
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Nov 1;86:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.021.
10
Geographies of an Online Social Network.一个在线社交网络的地域分布
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137248. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Social network size in humans.人类的社交网络规模。
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
2
Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution.蜂蜜、哈扎人、狩猎采集者与人类进化
J Hum Evol. 2014 Jun;71:119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
4
Altruism in social networks: evidence for a 'kinship premium'.社交网络中的利他主义:“亲缘溢价”的证据。
Br J Psychol. 2013 May;104(2):283-95. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02119.x. Epub 2012 May 24.
6
The role of metacognition in human social interactions.元认知在人类社会互动中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0123.
7
Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum.具身认知进化与小脑。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2097-107. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0112.
8
Is Dunbar's number up?邓巴数理论是否已过时?
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):174-6; discussion 180-2. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02075.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验