• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性接触塑造了 Facebook 的新闻资讯获取习惯。

Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet.

机构信息

Applico Lab, CNR-ISC, Rome, Italy.

Università di Venezia "Ca' Foscari", Venezia, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229129. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229129
PMID:32168347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7069632/
Abstract

The social brain hypothesis approximates the total number of social relationships we are able to maintain at 150. Similar cognitive constraints emerge in several aspects of our daily life, from our mobility to the way we communicate, and might even affect the way we consume information online. Indeed, despite the unprecedented amount of information we can access online, our attention span still remains limited. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that online users are more likely to ignore dissenting information, choosing instead to interact with information adhering to their own point of view. In this paper, we quantitatively analyse users' attention economy in news consumption on social media by analysing 14 million users interacting with 583 news outlets (pages) on Facebook over a time span of six years. In particular, we explore how users distribute their activity across news pages and topics. On the one hand, we find that, independently of their activity, users show a tendency to follow a very limited number of pages. On the other hand, users tend to interact with almost all the topics presented by their favoured pages. Finally, we introduce a taxonomy accounting for users' behaviour to distinguish between patterns of selective exposure and interest. Our findings suggest that segregation of users in echo chambers might be an emerging effect of users' activity on social media and that selective exposure-i.e. the tendency of users to consume information adhering to their preferred narratives-could be a major driver in their consumption patterns.

摘要

社交大脑假说(Social brain hypothesis)将我们能够维持的社交关系总数近似于 150 个。在我们日常生活的许多方面,类似的认知限制也会出现,从我们的流动性到我们的沟通方式,甚至可能影响我们在线获取信息的方式。事实上,尽管我们可以在线访问的信息量空前巨大,但我们的注意力仍然有限。此外,最近的研究表明,在线用户更有可能忽略不同意见的信息,而是选择与符合自己观点的信息进行互动。在本文中,我们通过分析 Facebook 上 1400 万用户在六年时间内与 583 个新闻媒体(页面)之间的互动,定量分析了用户在社交媒体上的新闻消费中的注意力经济。具体来说,我们探讨了用户如何在新闻页面和主题之间分配他们的活动。一方面,我们发现,无论他们的活动如何,用户都倾向于关注非常有限数量的页面。另一方面,用户倾向于与他们喜欢的页面上呈现的几乎所有主题进行互动。最后,我们引入了一个考虑用户行为的分类法,以区分选择性接触和兴趣模式。我们的研究结果表明,用户在回音室中的隔离可能是用户在社交媒体上的活动产生的一个新兴影响,而选择性接触——即用户消费符合其偏好叙事的信息的倾向——可能是他们消费模式的主要驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/14fbb6415940/pone.0229129.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/3b4093ce1a6f/pone.0229129.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/068afd002fd5/pone.0229129.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/82cf858d3f39/pone.0229129.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/dbfa32b87156/pone.0229129.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/ccda0a89a85a/pone.0229129.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/14fbb6415940/pone.0229129.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/3b4093ce1a6f/pone.0229129.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/068afd002fd5/pone.0229129.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/82cf858d3f39/pone.0229129.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/dbfa32b87156/pone.0229129.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/ccda0a89a85a/pone.0229129.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6d5/7069632/14fbb6415940/pone.0229129.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet.选择性接触塑造了 Facebook 的新闻资讯获取习惯。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229129. eCollection 2020.
2
Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook.脸书上的疫苗接种辩论极化。
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 14;36(25):3606-3612. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040.
3
Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation.错误信息时代的叙事趋势。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134641. eCollection 2015.
4
The echo chamber effect on social media.社交媒体的回音室效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
5
Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook.脸书上新闻消费的剖析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 21;114(12):3035-3039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617052114. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube.脸书和优兔上用户的两极分化。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 23;11(8):e0159641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159641. eCollection 2016.
7
Science vs conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of misinformation.科学与阴谋:错误信息时代的集体叙事
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0118093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118093. eCollection 2015.
8
Debunking in a world of tribes.在部落化的世界中破除谬误。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821. eCollection 2017.
9
PopRank: Ranking pages' impact and users' engagement on Facebook.PopRank:评估页面在 Facebook 上的影响力和用户参与度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0211038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211038. eCollection 2019.
10
Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.回音室效应:脸书上的情绪传染与群体极化。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;6:37825. doi: 10.1038/srep37825.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Media and the Evolution of Vaccine Preferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment.社交媒体与新冠疫情期间疫苗偏好的演变:离散选择实验
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 May 28;5:e66081. doi: 10.2196/66081.
2
Unveiling the drivers of active participation in social media discourse.揭示积极参与社交媒体话语的驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4906. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88117-x.
3
Mapping the global election landscape on social media in 2024.描绘2024年社交媒体上的全球选举图景。

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies and limitations in app usage and human mobility.应用程序使用和人类移动性的策略和限制。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47493-x.
2
Evidence for a conserved quantity in human mobility.人类流动性中的守恒量证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):485-491. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0364-x. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
PopRank: Ranking pages' impact and users' engagement on Facebook.PopRank:评估页面在 Facebook 上的影响力和用户参与度。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 5;20(2):e0316271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316271. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement.评估热门帖子对社交媒体参与度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84960-6.
5
Followers do not dictate the virality of news outlets on social media.关注者并不能决定新闻媒体在社交媒体上的传播力。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 28;3(7):pgae257. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae257. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Cross-platform social dynamics: an analysis of ChatGPT and COVID-19 vaccine conversations.跨平台社交动态:ChatGPT 与 COVID-19 疫苗对话分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53124-x.
7
The event-driven nature of online political hostility: How offline political events make online interactions more hostile.网络政治敌意的事件驱动本质:线下政治事件如何使网络互动更具敌意。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Nov 10;2(11):pgad382. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad382. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Characterizing engagement dynamics across topics on Facebook.刻画 Facebook 上各主题的参与动态。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0286150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286150. eCollection 2023.
9
Global Misinformation Spillovers in the Vaccination Debate Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multilingual Twitter Study.新冠疫情之前及期间疫苗接种辩论中的全球错误信息传播:多语言推特研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 May 24;3:e44714. doi: 10.2196/44714.
10
Topic selectivity and adaptivity promote spreading of short messages.主题选择性和适应性促进短消息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19719-y.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0211038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211038. eCollection 2019.
4
The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign.网络回音室的地理嵌入:来自英国脱欧运动的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206841. eCollection 2018.
5
A network approach to topic models.一种用于主题模型的网络方法。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jul 18;4(7):eaaq1360. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1360. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Debunking in a world of tribes.在部落化的世界中破除谬误。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821. eCollection 2017.
7
Inside the Echo Chamber.在回音室里。
Sci Am. 2017 Mar 14;316(4):60-63. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0417-60.
8
Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook.脸书上新闻消费的剖析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 21;114(12):3035-3039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617052114. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Nonparametric Bayesian inference of the microcanonical stochastic block model.微观正则随机块模型的非参数贝叶斯推断。
Phys Rev E. 2017 Jan;95(1-1):012317. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.012317. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.回音室效应:脸书上的情绪传染与群体极化。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;6:37825. doi: 10.1038/srep37825.