• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The role of metacognition in human social interactions.元认知在人类社会互动中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0123.
2
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
3
Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model.社交互动中的心理化:一个四成分模型。
Cortex. 2020 May;126:242-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Mechanisms of social cognition.社会认知的机制。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:287-313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making.从相互依存决策中的情绪表达中读取人们的想法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):73-88. doi: 10.1037/a0034251. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback.联合知觉判断中的集体利益:共享环境、元认知和反馈的部分作用。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:116-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition.超个人认知控制与元认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
Substrates of metacognition on perception and metacognition on higher-order cognition relate to different subsystems of the mentalizing network.关于感知的元认知底物与关于高阶认知的元认知底物与心理化网络的不同子系统相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Oct;37(10):3388-99. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23247. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Relationships between implicit and explicit uncertainty monitoring and mindreading: Evidence from autism spectrum disorder.内隐和外显不确定性监测与心理解读能力之间的关系:来自自闭症谱系障碍的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Apr;70:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Mistakes that affect others: an fMRI study on processing of own errors in a social context.影响他人的错误:一项在社会情境中处理自身错误的 fMRI 研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):405-13. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Synchrony in Bodily Interaction Enhances the Aha! Experience: Evidence for an Implicit Metacognitive Predictive Processing Mechanism.身体互动中的时间同步增强了“啊哈!”体验:一种内隐元认知预测加工机制的证据。
J Intell. 2025 Jul 7;13(7):83. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13070083.
2
Early Emergence of Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys.恒河猴元认知的早期出现
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e70012. doi: 10.1111/desc.70012.
3
Implicit manifestation of prospective metacognition in betting choices enhances its efficiency compared to explicit expression.与明确表达相比,前瞻性元认知在博彩选择中的隐性表现提高了其效率。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 5;19:1490530. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1490530. eCollection 2025.
4
Overconfident, but angry at least. AI-Based investigation of facial emotional expressions and self-assessment bias in human adults.过度自信,但至少还会生气。基于人工智能对成年人面部表情和自我评估偏差的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 10;13(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02590-7.
5
Brain stimulation over dorsomedial prefrontal cortex causally affects metacognitive bias but not mentalising.对背内侧前额叶皮层进行脑刺激会因果性地影响元认知偏差,但不会影响心理理论。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01277-1.
6
Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition.额极皮层与背外侧前额叶皮层相互作用,因果性地引导元认知。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 1;46(2):e70146. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70146.
7
Psychometric properties and validation of the metacognitive self-assessment scale (MSAS) in a Turkish sample.土耳其样本中元认知自我评估量表(MSAS)的心理测量特性及效度验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1411733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411733. eCollection 2024.
8
Emotion perception and online awareness following alcohol-intoxication: investigating possible deficits using the complex audio visual emotion assessment task.酒精中毒后的情绪感知与在线意识:使用复杂视听情绪评估任务探究可能存在的缺陷
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Apr;242(4):703-716. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06725-3. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
9
Older adults are relatively more susceptible to impulsive social influence than young adults.与年轻人相比,老年人相对更容易受到冲动性社会影响。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Sep 23;2(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00134-0.
10
A Theoretical Model of Emotional Processing in Visual Artmaking and Art Therapy.视觉艺术创作与艺术治疗中情绪处理的理论模型
Arts Psychother. 2024 Sep;90. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2024.102196. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Model-based approaches to neuroimaging: combining reinforcement learning theory with fMRI data.基于模型的神经影像学方法:将强化学习理论与 fMRI 数据相结合。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;1(4):501-510. doi: 10.1002/wcs.57. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
2
Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness.经前额叶皮质的 theta 爆发式经颅磁刺激会损害元认知视觉意识。
Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;1(3):165-75. doi: 10.1080/17588921003632529. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
3
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.达成共识:量化语言协调的好处。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):931-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797612436816. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
The economic approach to 'theory of mind'.经济方法对“心理理论”的研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2224-33. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0124.
5
Darwinism and cultural change.达尔文主义与文化变迁。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2160-70. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0118.
6
Language, gesture, skill: the co-evolutionary foundations of language.语言、手势、技能:语言的共同进化基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2141-51. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0116.
7
The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins.人类社会认知生态位及其进化起源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2119-29. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0114.
8
Taking sociality seriously: the structure of multi-dimensional social networks as a source of information for individuals.认真对待社会性:多维社交网络结构作为个体信息源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2108-18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0113.
9
What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition.集体决策失败告诉了我们什么有关元认知的信息。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1350-65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0420.
10
The neural basis of metacognitive ability.元认知能力的神经基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1338-49. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417.

元认知在人类社会互动中的作用。

The role of metacognition in human social interactions.

机构信息

University College London, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0123.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
PMID:22734064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3385688/
Abstract

Metacognition concerns the processes by which we monitor and control our own cognitive processes. It can also be applied to others, in which case it is known as mentalizing. Both kinds of metacognition have implicit and explicit forms, where implicit means automatic and without awareness. Implicit metacognition enables us to adopt a we-mode, through which we automatically take account of the knowledge and intentions of others. Adoption of this mode enhances joint action. Explicit metacognition enables us to reflect on and justify our behaviour to others. However, access to the underlying processes is very limited for both self and others and our reports on our own and others' intentions can be very inaccurate. On the other hand, recent experiments have shown that, through discussions of our perceptual experiences with others, we can detect sensory signals more accurately, even in the absence of objective feedback. Through our willingness to discuss with others the reasons for our actions and perceptions, we overcome our lack of direct access to the underlying cognitive processes. This creates the potential for us to build more accurate accounts of the world and of ourselves. I suggest, therefore, that explicit metacognition is a uniquely human ability that has evolved through its enhancement of collaborative decision-making.

摘要

元认知关注的是我们监控和控制自己认知过程的过程。它也可以应用于他人,在这种情况下,它被称为心理理论。这两种元认知都有内隐和外显的形式,内隐是指自动的和无意识的。内隐元认知使我们能够采用一种“我们模式”,通过这种模式,我们自动考虑他人的知识和意图。采用这种模式可以增强联合行动。外显元认知使我们能够反思和向他人证明自己的行为。然而,对于自己和他人来说,对潜在过程的访问是非常有限的,我们对自己和他人意图的报告可能非常不准确。另一方面,最近的实验表明,通过与他人讨论我们的感知经验,我们可以更准确地检测到感官信号,即使没有客观的反馈。通过我们愿意与他人讨论我们行动和感知的原因,我们克服了我们对潜在认知过程的直接访问的缺乏。这为我们构建更准确的世界和自我描述创造了潜力。因此,我认为外显元认知是一种独特的人类能力,它通过增强协作决策而进化。