School of Health Sciences, Research Centre PreHospen, University of Borås, The Prehospital Research Centre of Western Sweden, SE 501 90, Borås, Sweden.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Jun 27;20:42. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-42.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition where the risk of death has been reported to be even higher than that associated with the major complications of atherosclerosis, i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke. In all three conditions, early treatment could limit organ dysfunction and thereby improve the prognosis.
To describe what has been published in the literature a/ with regard to the association between delay until start of treatment and outcome in sepsis with the emphasis on the pre-hospital phase and b/ to present published data and the opportunity to improve various links in the pre-hospital chain of care in sepsis.
A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Embase (Ovid SP) and Cochrane Library databases.
In overall terms, we found a small number of articles (n = 12 of 1,162 unique hits) which addressed the prehospital phase. For each hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis appeared to become worse. However, there was no evidence that prehospital treatment improved the prognosis.Studies indicated that about half of the patients with severe sepsis used the emergency medical service (EMS) for transport to hospital. Patients who used the EMS experienced a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Among EMS-transported patients, those in whom the EMS staff already suspected sepsis at the scene had a shorter delay to treatment with antibiotics and the start of EGDT.There are insufficient data on other links in the prehospital chain of care, i.e. patients, bystanders and dispatchers.
Severe sepsis is a life-threatening condition. Previous studies suggest that, with every hour of delay until the start of antibiotics, the prognosis deteriorates. About half of the patients use the EMS. We need to know more about the present situation with regard to the different links in the prehospital chain of care in sepsis.
脓毒症是一种危及生命的病症,其死亡率据报道甚至高于动脉粥样硬化主要并发症(即心肌梗死和中风)。在这三种病症中,早期治疗都有可能限制器官功能障碍,从而改善预后。
描述文献中脓毒症患者治疗延迟与结局之间的关联,重点关注院前阶段,并介绍发表的数据以及改善脓毒症院前护理各环节的机会。
在 PubMed、Embase(Ovid SP)和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行文献检索。
总体而言,我们发现只有少数文章(1162 篇独特文献中仅有 12 篇)探讨了院前阶段。抗生素开始治疗每延迟一小时,预后似乎都会恶化。然而,没有证据表明院前治疗可以改善预后。研究表明,约有一半严重脓毒症患者使用急救医疗服务(EMS)转送至医院。使用 EMS 的患者接受抗生素治疗和早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)的启动时间更短。在 EMS 转运的患者中,现场的 EMS 工作人员已经怀疑为脓毒症的患者,接受抗生素治疗和 EGDT 启动的时间更短。关于院前护理链中的其他环节,如患者、旁观者和调度员,目前数据不足。
严重脓毒症是一种危及生命的病症。既往研究表明,抗生素开始治疗每延迟一小时,预后就会恶化。约有一半的患者使用 EMS。我们需要更多地了解脓毒症院前护理链中各个环节的现状。