• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。

Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.

机构信息

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL 60153, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL 60153, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036
PMID:30366742
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign implemented a 3-hour bundle including blood cultures, lactate, intravenous fluids, and antibiotics to improve mortality in sepsis. Though difficult to achieve, bundle compliance is associated with decreased hospital mortality. We predict that the implementation of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) sepsis screening tool will improve 3-hour bundle compliance.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if pre-hospital sepsis screening improves 3-hour bundle compliance.

METHODS

Prospective implementation of an EMS sepsis screening tool (June 2016-November 2016) was compared to a historical control (August 2015-March 2016). The protocol was facilitated via communication between nurses and EMS personnel. The primary outcome was 3-hour bundle compliance. Secondary outcomes included time to individual bundle components.

RESULTS

Of 135 patients screened, 20 were positive and included in the study, and subsequently compared to 43 control patients. Baseline demographics were similar, except median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was higher for the pre-EMS tool group (5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] vs. 2 [IQR 1-4], p < 0.01). Three-hour bundle compliance was significantly higher in the EMS tool group (80% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.01). The pre-EMS tool group had lower median time to lactate (15 [IQR 0-35] vs. 46 min [IQR 34-57], p < 0.001), 30 mL/kg IV fluids (6.5 [IQR 0-38] vs. 46 min [IQR 27.5-72], p < 0.001), and, although not significant, antibiotics (63.5 [IQR 44-92] vs. 72 min [IQR 59.5-112], p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an EMS sepsis screening tool resulted in improved 3-hour bundle compliance compared to retrospective control.

摘要

背景

拯救脓毒症运动实施了一个 3 小时的捆绑包,包括血液培养、乳酸、静脉输液和抗生素,以提高脓毒症患者的死亡率。虽然难以实现,但捆绑包的依从性与降低医院死亡率有关。我们预测,实施紧急医疗服务(EMS)脓毒症筛查工具将提高 3 小时捆绑包的依从性。

目的

确定院前脓毒症筛查是否能提高 3 小时捆绑包的依从性。

方法

前瞻性实施 EMS 脓毒症筛查工具(2016 年 6 月至 2016 年 11 月)与历史对照(2015 年 8 月至 2016 年 3 月)进行比较。该方案通过护士和 EMS 人员之间的沟通来促进。主要结局是 3 小时捆绑包的依从性。次要结局包括各个捆绑包组件的时间。

结果

在 135 名接受筛查的患者中,有 20 名呈阳性并纳入研究,随后与 43 名对照组患者进行比较。基线人口统计学特征相似,但前 EMS 工具组的中位序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分较高(5[四分位距(IQR)2-8]比 2[IQR 1-4],p<0.01)。EMS 工具组的 3 小时捆绑包依从性明显更高(80%比 44.2%,p<0.01)。前 EMS 工具组的乳酸中位时间更短(15[IQR 0-35]比 46 分钟[IQR 34-57],p<0.001),30ml/kg 静脉输液中位数时间更短(6.5[IQR 0-38]比 46 分钟[IQR 27.5-72],p<0.001),尽管不显著,但抗生素中位时间也更短(63.5[IQR 44-92]比 72 分钟[IQR 59.5-112],p=0.26)。

结论

与回顾性对照相比,实施 EMS 脓毒症筛查工具可提高 3 小时捆绑包的依从性。

相似文献

1
Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
2
Emergency department sepsis screening tool decreases time to antibiotics in patients with sepsis.急诊脓毒症筛查工具可缩短脓毒症患者使用抗生素的时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1745-1748. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.060. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Arriving by emergency medical services improves time to treatment endpoints for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.通过紧急医疗服务到达可改善严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的治疗终点时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):934-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01145.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
4
Management and outcomes of patients presenting with sepsis and septic shock to the emergency department during nursing handover: a retrospective cohort study.护理交接班期间急诊科脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的管理与结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0155-8.
5
Paramedic-Initiated CMS Sepsis Core Measure Bundle Prior to Hospital Arrival: A Stepwise Approach.院前护理人员启动的脓毒症核心测量集:一种逐步方法。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):291-300. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1254694. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Multicenter Implementation of a Treatment Bundle for Patients with Sepsis and Intermediate Lactate Values.针对脓毒症和中度乳酸值患者的治疗集束方案的多中心实施
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun 1;193(11):1264-70. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1489OC.
7
Impact of nurse-initiated ED sepsis protocol on compliance with sepsis bundles, time to initial antibiotic administration, and in-hospital mortality.护士启动的急诊科脓毒症治疗方案对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性、首次使用抗生素的时间及住院死亡率的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
8
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
9
Early Recognition and Treatment of Sepsis After the Addition of Lactate to the Laboratory's Critical Result Call List.在实验室危急结果通知列表中添加乳酸后对脓毒症的早期识别与治疗
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):111-115. doi: 10.1177/0885066616668148. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
10
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis Alerts in the Pre-hospital Setting: An Observational Retrospective Study of Emergency Medical Services' Response in Portugal (2020-2023).院前环境中的脓毒症警报:葡萄牙紧急医疗服务响应的观察性回顾性研究(2020 - 2023年)
Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82528. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82528. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Validation and comparison of triage-based screening strategies for sepsis.基于分诊的脓毒症筛查策略的验证和比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;85:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.037. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
3
Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
脓毒症预警系统对急诊科死亡率和依从性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2422823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22823.
4
Prehospital early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis: the PHEWS observational cohort and decision-analytic modelling study.成人疑似脓毒症的院前早期预警评分:PHEWS 观察性队列和决策分析模型研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(16):1-93. doi: 10.3310/NDTY2403.
5
Prehospital early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis: retrospective diagnostic cohort study.成人疑似脓毒症的院前早期预警评分:回顾性诊断队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Nov;40(11):768-776. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213315. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.脓毒症患者30天生存的院前预后因素;一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 13;11(1):e48. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2029. eCollection 2023.
7
Impact of Prehospital Antibiotics on in-Hospital Mortality in Emergency Medical Service Patients with Sepsis.院前抗生素对脓毒症急救医疗服务患者院内死亡率的影响。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 May 26;15:199-206. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S413791. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of prehospital transportation on 24-h fluid volume, a analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study on fluid volumes in patients with suspected infection.院前转运对24小时液体量的影响:一项关于疑似感染患者液体量的多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 21;9:1052071. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1052071. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical Value of the Lactate/Albumin Ratio and Lactate/Albumin Ratio × Age Score in the Assessment of Prognosis in Patients With Sepsis.乳酸/白蛋白比值及乳酸/白蛋白比值×年龄评分在脓毒症患者预后评估中的临床价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 15;8:732410. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.732410. eCollection 2021.
10
Association between serum lactate levels and enteral feeding intolerance in septic patients treated with vasopressors: a retrospective cohort study.血管升压药治疗的脓毒症患者血清乳酸水平与肠内营养不耐受的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1240. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6317.