Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Palliat Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):854-62. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0033. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
Achieving a good death is the ultimate goal of palliative medicine. Yet, very few studies have investigated factors affecting improvement in quality of dying. We therefore conducted a study to evaluate these factors in terminally ill Taiwanese cancer patients treated in a multidisciplinary palliative care unit.
We included data from terminally ill patients with cancer admitted to the Hospice and Palliative Care Unit in the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2000 to 2009. Quality of dying was assessed by patients' multidisciplinary team at admission and after death using the Good Death Scale and the Audit Scale. We used multivariable regression to assess the association between patient factors, including gender, age, diagnosis, days of hospitalization, calendar year of admission, Good Death score at admission, and process of care scores for physical care, physician-assessed autonomy, emotional support, communication, continuity of life, and physician-reported rate of closure, with the quality of dying.
Multivariate regression analysis identified lower Good Death score at admission, lower age 40-65 years, longer unit length of stay (>7 days), higher physician-assessed autonomy, better physician-assessed emotional support, and better physician-reported rate of closure as positively related (all p<0.0001) with improvement in good death scores.
In this study in a Taiwanese palliative care unit; we found that late referral to the unit and low physician-assessed autonomy were key factors negatively affecting quality of dying. Earlier truth-tellling and end-of-life care discussions between physicians and patients might improve the quality of dying in this population.
实现善终是缓和医疗的最终目标。然而,很少有研究调查影响临终患者生活质量改善的因素。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以评估台湾多学科缓和医疗病房中终末期癌症患者的这些因素。
我们纳入了 2000 年至 2009 年期间入住国立台湾大学医院缓和医疗暨安宁病房的终末期癌症患者的数据。使用善终量表和审计量表,由患者的多学科团队在入院时和死亡后评估临终患者的生活质量。我们使用多变量回归分析评估患者因素(包括性别、年龄、诊断、住院天数、入院年份、入院时的善终评分和躯体护理、医生评估的自主权、情感支持、沟通、生活连续性以及医生报告的结束率的护理过程评分)与临终生活质量之间的关系。
多变量回归分析确定入院时的善终评分较低、年龄在 40-65 岁之间、住院时间较长(>7 天)、医生评估的自主权较高、医生评估的情感支持较好以及医生报告的结束率较高与善终评分的改善呈正相关(均 p<0.0001)。
在这项台湾缓和医疗病房的研究中,我们发现晚期转诊到病房和医生评估的自主权较低是影响临终患者生活质量的关键负面因素。医生和患者之间更早地进行坦诚相待和临终关怀讨论可能会改善该人群的临终生活质量。