• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医疗服务提供者角度看中国上海癌症患者的临终及死亡质量:一项横断面研究。

The quality of dying and death of patients with cancer from Shanghai in China from the perspective of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Min Jiawei, Liu Peihao, Xiao Kaifeng, Huang Zhe, Lai Xiaobin

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Nursing, Shanghai Cancer Center of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Mar 8;11(2):179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.010
PMID:38707693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064619/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of dying and death among deceased patients with cancer in Shanghai from the perspective of healthcare providers.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Shanghai from April to July 2023. A convenience sample of 261 healthcare providers working at eight healthcare institutions participated. Each participant was asked to evaluate the quality of dying and death of one deceased patient who had been cared for recently using the Good Death Scale for patients in China (GDS-PCN). The scale included family companionship (eight items), dying with peace (six items), professional care (six items), preparation & no regrets (five items), maintaining dignity (four items), keeping autonomy (four items), and physical wellbeing (three items) seven dimensions, 36 items.

RESULTS

The total GDS-PCN score was 144.11 ± 17.86. The professional care dimension scored the highest (4.21 ± 0.58), whereas the preparation and no regret dimension scored the lowest (3.75 ± 0.70). Significant differences in the GDS-PCN scores were based on the healthcare institution grade, ward type, hospitalization duration, communication about the condition, treatment, and death-related topics with the healthcare provider, and decision-making style ( < 0.05). The quality of dying and death of the deceased patients was higher among those who received care in community health service centers and hospice wards, those who had been hospitalized for more than 15 days, those who had discussed their personal conditions, treatment, and death-related topics with healthcare providers to a greater extent; and those who were involved in decision-making ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The overall quality of dying and death among cancer patients in Shanghai is moderate to high, but the quality of dying and death in the preparation and no regret dimension and the keeping autonomy dimension still have room for improvement. Increased utilization of hospice care and better communication between patients and healthcare providers may enhance decedents' quality of dying and death. Future research on this topic is required from different perspectives and on a broader scale in the mainland of China.

摘要

目的

从医疗服务提供者的角度评估上海癌症死亡患者的临终和死亡质量。

方法

本横断面研究于2023年4月至7月在上海进行。选取了在八家医疗机构工作的261名医疗服务提供者作为便利样本。要求每位参与者使用中国患者善终量表(GDS-PCN)对一名近期接受过护理的死亡患者的临终和死亡质量进行评估。该量表包括家庭陪伴(8项)、平静离世(6项)、专业护理(6项)、准备与无悔(5项)、维护尊严(4项)、保持自主(4项)和身体安康(3项)七个维度,共36项。

结果

GDS-PCN总分是144.11±17.86。专业护理维度得分最高(4.21±0.58),而准备与无悔维度得分最低(3.75±0.70)。GDS-PCN得分基于医疗机构等级、病房类型、住院时长、与医疗服务提供者就病情、治疗及死亡相关话题的沟通情况以及决策方式存在显著差异(<0.05)。在社区卫生服务中心和临终关怀病房接受护理的患者、住院超过15天的患者、与医疗服务提供者更多地讨论过个人病情、治疗及死亡相关话题的患者以及参与决策的患者,其死亡患者的临终和死亡质量更高(<0.05)。

结论

上海癌症患者的临终和死亡总体质量中等偏高,但在准备与无悔维度以及保持自主维度的临终和死亡质量仍有提升空间。增加临终关怀的使用以及改善患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通可能会提高死者的临终和死亡质量。未来需要在中国内地从不同角度和更广泛的范围对该主题进行研究。

相似文献

1
The quality of dying and death of patients with cancer from Shanghai in China from the perspective of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study.从医疗服务提供者角度看中国上海癌症患者的临终及死亡质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Mar 8;11(2):179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A good death from the perspective of healthcare providers from the internal medicine department in Shanghai: A qualitative study.上海内科医疗服务提供者视角下的善终:一项定性研究
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Nov 27;9(2):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.11.002. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
The decision for hospice care in patients with terminal illness in Shanghai: A mixed-method study.上海晚期疾病患者临终关怀决策的混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Dec 11;9(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.12.002. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Hospice preference of the family decision-makers for cancer patients in China: an exploratory study.中国癌症患者家庭决策者对临终关怀的偏好:一项探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 15;21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01112-1.
6
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
7
Development and validation of the hospice professional coping scale among Chinese nurses.中文版护生专业应对量表的编制与信效度检验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10970-9.
8
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
9
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
10
Quality of dying among elderly people diagnosed with dementia in nursing homes: A mixed methods study.养老院中被诊断为痴呆症的老年人的临终质量:一项混合方法研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Jun;30(3):435-450. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12871. Epub 2022 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Good Death and Death Literacy Levels of Nurses Working in Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.姑息治疗护士对善终的认知及死亡素养水平:一项横断面研究
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70036. doi: 10.1111/inr.70036.
2
Self-reported knowledge and difficulties towards palliative care among healthcare professionals in rural China: a cross-sectional study.中国农村医护人员对姑息治疗的自我报告知识和困难:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 8;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01674-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.2022年中国癌症发病率与死亡率
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Feb 2;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
[Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022].[2022年中国癌症发病率和死亡率]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 23;46(3):221-231. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035.
3
Quality of Dying and Death of Patients With Cancer in Hospice Care in Uganda.乌干达临终关怀中癌症患者的临终和死亡质量。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan;9:e2200386. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00386.
4
End-of-Life Communication in the Emergency Department: The Emergency Physicians' Perspectives.急诊科的临终沟通:急诊医生的观点。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):29-34. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_80_21. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Caregiver Reported Quality of End-of-Life Care of Adolescent and Young Adult Decedents With Cancer.照顾者报告的青少年和青年癌症死者临终关怀质量。
J Palliat Care. 2022 Apr;37(2):87-92. doi: 10.1177/08258597211001991. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Family Members of ICU Patients.验证中文版 ICU 患者家属濒死和死亡体验问卷。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
7
Current Status of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Communication for Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer.晚期和转移性乳腺癌患者的预先医疗指示和临终关怀沟通的现状。
Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):e686-e693. doi: 10.1002/onco.13640. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patient as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing and medical social workers.肿瘤学家、癌症护理认证/专科护士和医务社会工作者对晚期癌症患者临终讨论的障碍看法。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 16;50(12):1426-1433. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa146.
9
The Concept of a Good Death From the Perspectives of Family Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients.晚期癌症患者家属视角下的善终概念。
Omega (Westport). 2022 Jun;85(2):303-316. doi: 10.1177/0030222820945082. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Nurse-rated good death of Chinese terminally ill patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study.中文版终末期癌症患者护士评价良好死亡的现况调查:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13147. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13147. Epub 2019 Aug 21.