Suppr超能文献

一项双盲安慰剂对照试验评估了赖氨酸安非他命甲硫酸盐对 6 至 12 岁 ADHD 儿童情绪不稳定的影响。

The effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on emotional lability in children 6 to 12 years of age with ADHD in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

1Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

出版信息

J Atten Disord. 2014 Feb;18(2):123-32. doi: 10.1177/1087054712448252. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on emotional lability (EL) in children with ADHD.

METHOD

Post hoc analyses of a placebo-controlled trial of LDX-stratified children (aged 6-12 years) with ADHD to prominent and not prominent EL at baseline (score >3 or ≤3, respectively, on Conners' Parent Rating Scale [CPRS] items of anger, loss of temper, and irritability). Efficacy was assessed by change in CPRS EL scores and ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total and subscale scores. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

LDX showed improvement versus placebo (p < .0005) for EL item least squares (LS) mean change scores at endpoint and throughout the day. At baseline, 138 and 73 participants randomized to LDX treatment and having baseline and endpoint CPRS scores were categorized with CPRS-derived prominent and not prominent baseline EL, respectively; 41 and 31 participants randomized to placebo were categorized with CPRS-derived prominent and not prominent baseline EL, respectively. ADHD-RS-IV total and subscale scores decreased with LDX regardless of baseline EL severity. TEAEs included decreased appetite, insomnia, upper abdominal pain, headache, and irritability.

CONCLUSION

EL and ADHD symptoms improved with LDX regardless of baseline EL symptom severity. LDX demonstrated a safety profile consistent with long-acting psychostimulant use.

摘要

目的

评估右苯丙胺 dimesylate(LDX)对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童情绪不稳(EL)的影响。

方法

对 LDX 分层的 ADHD 儿童(6-12 岁)进行安慰剂对照试验的事后分析,根据基线时 Conners 父母评定量表(CPRS)愤怒、发脾气和易怒项目得分>3 或≤3(分别为明显和不明显 EL)进行分层。通过 CPRS EL 评分和 ADHD 评定量表-IV(ADHD-RS-IV)总分和子量表评分的变化来评估疗效。安全性措施包括治疗后出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。

结果

与安慰剂相比,LDX 在终点和全天的 EL 项目最小二乘(LS)均数变化评分方面显示出改善(p<0.0005)。在基线时,分别有 138 名和 73 名随机接受 LDX 治疗且基线和终点 CPRS 评分均有 CPRS 衍生的明显和不明显基线 EL 的参与者被分类;分别有 41 名和 31 名随机接受安慰剂治疗且基线 CPRS 评分有明显和不明显基线 EL 的参与者被分类。无论基线 EL 严重程度如何,ADHD-RS-IV 总分和子量表评分均随 LDX 而降低。TEAEs 包括食欲减退、失眠、上腹痛、头痛和易怒。

结论

无论基线 EL 症状严重程度如何,LDX 均可改善 EL 和 ADHD 症状。LDX 显示出与长效精神兴奋剂使用一致的安全性特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验