• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大众社会接触干预及其对心理健康相关污名和意图歧视的影响。

Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination.

机构信息

Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, 29, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 28;12:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-489.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-489
PMID:22742085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3461459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems is an important public health issue, and interventions aimed at reducing exposure to stigma and discrimination can improve the lives of people with mental health problems. Social contact has long been considered to be one of the most effective strategies for improving inter-group relations. For this study, we assess the impact of a population level social contact intervention among people with and without mental health problems.

METHODS

This study investigated the impact of social contact and whether presence of specific facilitating factors (equal status, common goals, cooperation and friendship potential): (1) improves intended stigmatising behaviour; (2) increases future willingness to disclose a mental health problem; and (3) promotes behaviours associated with anti-stigma campaign engagement. Two mass participation social contact programmes within England's Time to Change campaign were evaluated via a 2-part questionnaire. 403 participants completed initial questionnaires (70% paper, 30% online) and 83 completed follow-up questionnaires online 4-6 weeks later.

RESULTS

This study investigated the impact of social contact and whether presence of specific facilitating factors (equal status, common goals, cooperation and friendship potential): (1) improves intended stigmatising behaviour; (2) increases future willingness to disclose a mental health problem; and (3) promotes behaviours associated with anti-stigma campaign engagement. Two mass participation social contact programmes within England's Time to Change campaign were evaluated via a 2-part questionnaire. 403 participants completed initial questionnaires (70% paper, 30% online) and 83 completed follow-up questionnaires online 4-6 weeks later. Campaign events facilitated meaningful intergroup social contact between individuals with and without mental health problems. Presence of facilitating conditions predicted improved stigma-related behavioural intentions and subsequent campaign engagement 4-6 weeks following social contact. Contact, however, was not predictive of future willingness to disclose mental health problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings emphasise the importance of facilitating conditions to promote positive social contact between individuals and also suggest that social contact interventions can work on a mass level. Future research should investigate this type of large scale intervention among broader and more representative populations.

摘要

背景

与心理健康问题相关的污名化和歧视是一个重要的公共卫生问题,旨在减少污名化和歧视的干预措施可以改善心理健康问题患者的生活。社会接触长期以来一直被认为是改善群体间关系的最有效策略之一。在这项研究中,我们评估了针对有和没有心理健康问题的人群的人群层面的社会接触干预的影响。

方法

本研究调查了社会接触的影响以及是否存在特定的促进因素(平等地位、共同目标、合作和友谊潜力):(1)改善预期的污名化行为;(2)增加未来披露心理健康问题的意愿;(3)促进与反污名运动参与相关的行为。通过英格兰“改变时间”运动中的两个大众参与的社会接触计划,通过两部分问卷进行了评估。403 名参与者完成了初始问卷(70%纸质,30%在线),83 名参与者在 4-6 周后在线完成了后续问卷。

结果

本研究调查了社会接触的影响以及是否存在特定的促进因素(平等地位、共同目标、合作和友谊潜力):(1)改善预期的污名化行为;(2)增加未来披露心理健康问题的意愿;(3)促进与反污名运动参与相关的行为。通过英格兰“改变时间”运动中的两个大众参与的社会接触计划,通过两部分问卷进行了评估。403 名参与者完成了初始问卷(70%纸质,30%在线),83 名参与者在 4-6 周后在线完成了后续问卷。运动事件促进了有和没有心理健康问题的个体之间有意义的群体间社会接触。存在促进条件预测了在社会接触后 4-6 周内与污名相关的行为意向和随后的运动参与度的改善。然而,接触并不能预测未来披露心理健康问题的意愿。

结论

研究结果强调了促进条件对于促进个体之间积极的社会接触的重要性,也表明社会接触干预可以在大规模层面上发挥作用。未来的研究应该在更广泛和更具代表性的人群中调查这种大规模干预。

相似文献

1
Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination.大众社会接触干预及其对心理健康相关污名和意图歧视的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 28;12:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-489.
2
Influence of Time to Change's social marketing interventions on stigma in England 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年变革时机的社会营销干预措施对英国耻辱感的影响
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Apr;55:s77-88. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126672.
3
Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach.印度农村地区常见精神障碍反耻辱运动的评估:一种混合方法研究。
Psychol Med. 2017 Feb;47(3):565-575. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002804. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
4
England's time to change antistigma campaign: one-year outcomes of service user-rated experiences of discrimination.英格兰改变反污名运动的时机:服务使用者对歧视经历的评价的一年期结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(5):451-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100422.
5
Association between public views of mental illness and self-stigma among individuals with mental illness in 14 European countries.14 个欧洲国家中公众对精神疾病的看法与精神疾病患者的自我污名之间的关联。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1741-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002558. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
6
Impact on help-seeking behaviours of a campaign perceived to decrease stigma and increase openness around mental health.心理健康宣传活动对寻求帮助行为的影响,该活动旨在减少污名化并增加心理健康方面的开放度。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Oct;35(4):1378-1385. doi: 10.1002/hpja.859. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
A randomised controlled trial of repeated filmed social contact on reducing mental illness-related stigma in young adults.一项随机对照试验研究了重复的录像社会接触对减少青年成年人与精神疾病相关的耻辱感的效果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):199-208. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001050. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Responses to mental health stigma questions: the importance of social desirability and data collection method.对心理健康污名问题的回应:社会期望和数据收集方法的重要性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;57(3):152-60. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700304.
9
Relationships between anti-stigma programme awareness, disclosure comfort and intended help-seeking regarding a mental health problem.抗污名化计划认知、披露舒适度与心理健康问题求助意向之间的关系。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;211(5):316-322. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.195867. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Evaluation of a brief anti-stigma campaign in Cambridge: do short-term campaigns work?剑桥短期反污名运动评估:短期运动是否有效?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 14;10:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-339.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework to psychosis stigma in Malawi.将健康污名与歧视框架应用于马拉维的精神病污名问题。
PLOS Ment Health. 2025;2(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000306. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Mental illness-related stigma and its associated factors among primary health care professionals in rural China.中国农村基层医疗卫生专业人员中与精神疾病相关的耻辱感及其相关因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 30;16:1519527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1519527. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale, a mental health stigma-related behaviour measure.评估《报告与预期行为量表》波斯语版本的信度和效度,该量表是一种与心理健康污名相关的行为测量工具。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 6;16:1553002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553002. eCollection 2025.
4
Decrease in provider stigma is associated with improved quality health indicators among individuals receiving methadone in primary care centers in Ukraine.在乌克兰初级保健中心接受美沙酮治疗的个体中,提供者污名的减少与改善的健康质量指标相关。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Feb;136:104682. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104682. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Negotiating familial mental illness stigma: The role of family members of persons living with mental illnesses.协商家庭精神疾病污名:精神疾病患者家属的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0311170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311170. eCollection 2024.
6
Non-traditional mental health clinical placements: An effective means for reducing self-stigma in pre-registration nursing students.非传统心理健康临床实习:减少预注册护理学生自我污名化的有效手段。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;32(1):143-151. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13093. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
7
Shaping and shifting schemas on supervised injectable opioid treatment: findings from a cross-sectional qualitative study in two German treatment facilities.在监督下注射类阿片治疗中塑造和改变模式:来自两家德国治疗机构的横断面定性研究结果。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 May 27;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00475-5.
8
Social contact as a strategy to reduce stigma in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and expert perspectives.社会接触作为中低收入国家减少污名化的策略:一项系统综述及专家观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;4(3):e0003053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003053. eCollection 2024.
9
Community-based rehabilitation for people with psychosocial disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the grey literature.低收入和中等收入国家心理社会残疾者的社区康复:灰色文献的系统评价
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Mar 14;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00630-0.
10
Pragmatic, feasibility randomized controlled trial of a recorded mental health recovery narrative intervention: narrative experiences online intervention for informal carers (NEON-C).一项关于心理健康康复叙事记录干预措施的实用、可行性随机对照试验:照顾者在线叙事体验干预(NEON-C)
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 23;14:1272396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272396. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies.挑战精神疾病的公众污名:一项结果研究的荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Oct;63(10):963-73. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100529.
2
'Our community is the worst': the influence of cultural beliefs on stigma, relationships with family and help-seeking in three ethnic communities in London.“我们的社区是最糟糕的”:伦敦三个族裔社区中文化信仰对污名、与家人关系和寻求帮助的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;59(6):535-44. doi: 10.1177/0020764012443759. Epub 2012 May 15.
3
What is a mental illness? Public views and their effects on attitudes and disclosure.什么是精神疾病?公众的看法及其对态度和披露的影响。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;46(7):641-50. doi: 10.1177/0004867412438873. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
4
Association between public views of mental illness and self-stigma among individuals with mental illness in 14 European countries.14 个欧洲国家中公众对精神疾病的看法与精神疾病患者的自我污名之间的关联。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1741-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002558. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
5
Development and psychometric properties of the reported and intended behaviour scale (RIBS): a stigma-related behaviour measure.报告和意图行为量表(RIBS)的开发和心理测量特性:一种与污名相关的行为测量工具。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Sep;20(3):263-71. doi: 10.1017/s2045796011000308.
6
Best practices: Strategic stigma change (SSC): five principles for social marketing campaigns to reduce stigma.最佳实践:战略性污名改变(SSC):减少污名化社会营销活动的五项原则。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Aug;62(8):824-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.8.pss6208_0824.
7
Evaluation of a brief anti-stigma campaign in Cambridge: do short-term campaigns work?剑桥短期反污名运动评估:短期运动是否有效?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 14;10:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-339.
8
The impact of a national mental health arts and film festival on stigma and recovery.国家心理健康艺术和电影节对污名化和康复的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 Jan;123(1):71-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01573.x.
9
Rethinking 'mental health stigma'.重新思考“心理健康污名化”。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Apr;20(2):131-2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq015.
10
Challenging mental health-related stigma through social contact.通过社交接触挑战与心理健康相关的污名化现象。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Apr;20(2):130-1. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq014. Epub 2010 Feb 19.