Hart Prue H
Department of Inflammation, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6008, Australia.
Discov Med. 2012 Jun;13(73):397-404.
There is considerable debate about the benefits of vitamin D supplementation for multiple sclerosis, allergic asthma, and type 1 diabetes. This has been driven mainly by observational studies linking vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency with increased prevalence of autoimmune and other diseases driven by immune processes. Randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation to treat these (and other) diseases have been disappointing. This review examines the evidence that circulating vitamin D levels provide a surrogate measure of sun exposure and that it is the other molecules and pathways induced by sun exposure, rather than vitamin D-driven processes, that explain many of the benefits often attributed to vitamin D.
关于补充维生素D对多发性硬化症、过敏性哮喘和1型糖尿病的益处存在相当大的争议。这主要是由观察性研究推动的,这些研究将维生素D缺乏和不足与自身免疫性疾病及其他由免疫过程驱动的疾病患病率增加联系起来。补充维生素D治疗这些(以及其他)疾病的随机对照试验结果令人失望。本综述考察了以下证据:循环维生素D水平可作为衡量阳光照射的替代指标,并且是阳光照射诱导的其他分子和途径,而非维生素D驱动的过程,解释了许多通常归因于维生素D的益处。