School of Applied Psychosocial Studies, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):162-73. doi: 10.3109/13682820902818870.
Research conducted on preterm children's linguistic skills has provided varying pictures, and the question of whether and to what extent preterm children are delayed in early language acquisition remains largely unresolved.
To examine communicative and linguistic development during the second year in a group of Italian children born prematurely using the 'Primo Vocabolario del Bambino' (PVB), the Italian version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory. The primary goal was to compare action/gesture production, word comprehension, and word production, and the relationship between these three domains in preterm children and to normative data obtained from a large sample of Italian children born at term. A second aim was to address the longstanding debate regarding the use of chronological versus corrected gestational age in the assessment of preterm children's abilities.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Parents of twelve preterm children completed the PVB questionnaire at five age points during the children's second year, and scores were compared with those from a normative sample of full-term children and those of 59 full-term children selected as a control group from the normative sample for the PVB.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Preterm children exhibited a delay in all three aspects of communication and language. In particular, communicative-linguistic age tended to lag approximately 3 months behind chronological age when children were between the ages of 12 and 24 months. When chronological age was used, preterm children's percentile scores for all three components of communication and language fell within the lower limits of the normal range, while scores calculated using corrected age either fell at or above the 50th percentile.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that despite the significant biological risk engendered by premature birth, early communicative and linguistic development appears to proceed in a relatively robust fashion among preterm children, with tight relations across communicative domains as in full-term children. Employing both chronological and corrected gestational age criteria in the evaluation of preterm children's abilities may provide important information about their progress in language acquisition. This may be especially important during the initial stages of communicative and linguistic development, inasmuch as comparisons of the two sets of scores may provide clinicians with a way to distinguish children who may be at risk for language problems from those who may be expected to progress normally.
对早产儿语言技能的研究提供了不同的结果,早产儿在早期语言习得方面是否以及在何种程度上存在延迟的问题仍未得到解决。
使用意大利语版麦克阿瑟-贝茨交际发展量表(Primo Vocabolario del Bambino,PVB),对一组意大利早产儿在第二年的交际和语言发展进行研究。主要目标是比较早产儿在动作/手势产生、单词理解和单词产生方面的情况,并与足月出生的大量意大利儿童的正常数据进行比较。第二个目的是解决长期以来关于在评估早产儿能力时使用实际年龄还是校正胎龄的争论。
12 名早产儿的父母在孩子第二年的五个时间点完成了 PVB 问卷,将得分与足月儿童的正常样本和从 PVB 正常样本中选择的 59 名足月对照组儿童的得分进行比较。
早产儿在所有三个语言交流方面都存在延迟。特别是,在 12 至 24 个月之间,儿童的交际-语言年龄往往比实际年龄落后约 3 个月。当使用实际年龄时,早产儿在所有三个语言交流和语言成分的百分位数得分都在正常范围的下限内,而使用校正胎龄时,得分则落在或高于第 50 个百分位。
研究结果表明,尽管早产带来了显著的生物学风险,但早产儿的早期交际和语言发展似乎相对稳健,与足月儿童一样,交际领域之间存在紧密联系。在评估早产儿能力时同时使用实际年龄和校正胎龄标准,可以为他们的语言习得进展提供重要信息。这在交际和语言发展的初始阶段尤为重要,因为对这两组分数的比较可以为临床医生提供一种方法,将可能存在语言问题的儿童与可能正常发展的儿童区分开来。