• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨锚定 III 类颌间牵引后下颌和关节窝变化的三维评估。

Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.017
PMID:22748987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3553657/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Conventional treatment for young Class III patients involves extraoral devices designed to either protract the maxilla or restrain mandibular growth. The use of skeletal anchorage offers a promising alternative to obtain orthopedic results with fewer dental compensations. Our aim was to evaluate 3-dimensional changes in the mandibles and the glenoid fossae of Class III patients treated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive skeletal Class III patients between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean age, 11.10 ± 1.1 year) were treated with Class III intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (2 in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and 2 in the anterior mandible). The patients had cone-beam computed tomography images taken before initial loading and at the end of active treatment. Three-dimensional models were generated from these images, registered on the anterior cranial base, and analyzed by using color maps.

RESULTS

Posterior displacement of the mandible at the end of treatment was observed in all subjects (posterior ramus: mean, 2.74 ± 1.36 mm; condyles: mean, 2.07 ± 1.16 mm; chin: mean, -0.13 ± 2.89 mm). Remodeling of the glenoid fossa at the anterior eminence (mean, 1.38 ± 1.03 mm) and bone resorption at the posterior wall (mean, -1.34 ± 0.6 mm) were observed in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This new treatment approach offers a promising alternative to restrain mandibular growth for Class III patients with a component of mandibular prognathism or to compensate for maxillary deficiency in patients with hypoplasia of the midface. Future studies with long-term follow-up and comparisons with facemask and chincup therapies are needed to better understand the treatment effects.

摘要

引言

传统的治疗年轻的 III 类患者涉及的口腔外设备旨在要么延长上颌骨或抑制下颌骨生长。骨骼锚固的使用提供了一个有前途的替代方法,以获得较少的牙齿补偿的矫形效果。我们的目的是评估使用骨锚定上颌骨前牵引治疗 III 类患者的下颌骨和颞下颌关节窝的三维变化。

方法

25 例连续的骨骼 III 类患者,年龄在 9 至 13 岁之间(平均年龄,11.10 ± 1.1 岁),用 III 类颌间弹性装置和双侧微型板治疗(上颌骨的眶下嵴 2 个,下颌骨前 2 个)。在初始加载和主动治疗结束时,对患者进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像。从这些图像生成三维模型,在颅前基底注册,并通过使用彩色图谱进行分析。

结果

所有患者在治疗结束时都观察到下颌骨的后向移位(后支:平均 2.74 ± 1.36 毫米;髁突:平均 2.07 ± 1.16 毫米;颏:平均-0.13 ± 2.89 毫米)。在大多数患者中观察到颞下颌关节窝前嵴的重塑(平均 1.38 ± 1.03 毫米)和后壁的骨吸收(平均-1.34 ± 0.6 毫米)。

结论

这种新的治疗方法为下颌骨前突或中面部发育不全的患者提供了一种有前途的替代方法,用于抑制 III 类患者的下颌骨生长或补偿上颌骨不足。需要进行长期随访的未来研究和与面具和颏兜治疗的比较,以更好地了解治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction.骨锚定 III 类颌间牵引后下颌和关节窝变化的三维评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.017.
2
Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.使用形状对应分析来量化与骨锚式III类错颌矫正相关的骨骼变化。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):329-36. doi: 10.2319/041513-288.1. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.与骨锚式上颌骨前牵引相比,分析功能性矫治器(面具)和快速上颌扩展对上颌骨变化的三维影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):705-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.011.
4
Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.上颌骨骨锚定牵引相关上颌骨变化的三维评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.025.
5
Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.骨性支抗治疗对上颌后缩畸形的牙颌面效应。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.009.
6
Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series.使用颌间牵引力早期治疗上颌骨不足 III 类患者:一项病例系列研究的结果。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e350-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.019. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.骨性上颌前牵引治疗生长发育期 III 类错颌患者的疗效的形态计量学分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Apr;33(2):121-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq170. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
8
Effect of Class III bone anchor treatment on airway.III类骨锚治疗对气道的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):591-6. doi: 10.2319/041614-282.1. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.生长发育期患者的三维锥形束计算机断层扫描模型的叠加
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018.
10
Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.骨锚定上颌骨前牵引的牙颌面效应:连续治疗的 III 类错患者的对照研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Camouflage Treatment with Class III Elastics on Temporomandibular Joint and Dentoskeletal Relationships: A Pilot CBCT and MRI-Based Clinical Trial.Ⅲ类牵引掩饰性治疗对颞下颌关节及牙颌面关系的影响:一项基于锥形束CT和磁共振成像的初步临床试验
Turk J Orthod. 2025 Jul 2;38(2):116-127. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.153.
2
Incidence of unexpected condylar displacement following comprehensive orthodontic treatment in adults.成人综合正畸治疗后髁突意外移位的发生率。
Angle Orthod. 2025 Mar 1;95(2):179-187. doi: 10.2319/010924-24.1.
3
Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.上颌骨骨锚定牵引相关上颌骨变化的三维评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.025.
2
Chincup treatment modifies the mandibular shape in children with prognathism.颏兜治疗可改变下颌前突儿童的下颌形态。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jul;140(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.046.
3
Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.
两种上颌骨牵引矫正方案的牙颌面和骨骼影响:骨锚与面具。
Head Face Med. 2024 Oct 18;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00462-w.
4
Fractal analysis of mandibular trabecular pattern following protraction facemask therapy : A pilot study.牵引面罩治疗后下颌骨小梁模式的分形分析:一项初步研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00544-z.
5
Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis.不同上颌骨前徙方案在单侧唇腭裂患者中的比较:有限元分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 20;28(5):260. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05633-2.
6
Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial.微螺钉支抗上颌骨前牵引对伴有上颌骨发育不足的青春期前儿童的牙颌面影响:一项随机对照试验。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jun 12;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00473-4.
7
Evaluation of the dimensional changes in the mandible, condyles, and the temporomandibular joint following skeletal class III treatment with chin cup and bonded maxillary bite block using low-dose computed tomography: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.应用低剂量计算机断层扫描评估颏兜和上颌粘接式咬合板联合治疗骨性 III 类错颌后下颌、髁突和颞下颌关节的三维变化:一项单中心、随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2023 Mar 13;12:264. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130941.1. eCollection 2023.
8
Temporary anchorage devices and the forces and effects on the dentition and surrounding structures during orthodontic treatment: a scoping review.正畸治疗中临时支抗装置对牙齿和周围结构的作用力和影响:范围综述。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):324-337. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac072.
9
Comparison of treatment effects between two types of facemasks in early Class III patients.两种面罩对早期III类错颌患者治疗效果的比较。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Feb;9(1):212-218. doi: 10.1002/cre2.694. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
10
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.骨锚式上颌骨前牵引术(BAMP):综述
J Orthod Sci. 2022 May 4;11:8. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_153_21. eCollection 2022.
骨性上颌前牵引治疗生长发育期 III 类错颌患者的疗效的形态计量学分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Apr;33(2):121-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq170. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
4
Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.骨锚定上颌骨前牵引的牙颌面效应:连续治疗的 III 类错患者的对照研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037.
5
Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.两种上颌骨牵引方案的比较:骨锚与快速扩弓面弓。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):799-806. doi: 10.2319/111709-651.1.
6
Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.上颌骨牵引与口外弓的三维分析至微型板。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):274-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.009.
7
Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.使用微型钢板对上颌骨进行正畸牵引:治疗面中部凹陷的新视角。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.007.
8
Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.生长发育期患者的三维锥形束计算机断层扫描模型的叠加
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018.
9
Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.未经治疗的III类错牙合畸形患者颅面部生长的半纵向头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.025.
10
Treatment effects of occipitomental anchorage appliance of maxillary protraction combined with chincup traction in children with Class III malocclusion.枕颏牵引矫治器联合颏兜牵引对上颌前牵引治疗Ⅲ类错颌儿童的疗效
J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 May;106(5):380-91. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60323-5.