Nast Alexander, Rosumeck Stefanie, Sporbeck Birte, Rzany Berthold
Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(4):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.09.023. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
The development of guidelines almost always requires considerable time and financial resources. An important task is therefore to identify and evaluate online methods that facilitate guideline work. ONLINE CONSENSUS CONFERENCE: During the development of the S2k guideline for the management of staphylococcus aureus infections an online consensus conference was held using an online tool provided by the Deutsche Forschungsnetz in combination with a telephone conference. During the 2-hour meeting, no technical difficulties occurred. A survey among the participants showed that this format had a high rate of acceptance. ONLINE REVIEW: During the development of the update of the German S3-Guidelines for the therapy of psoriasis an external open review was performed. An online platform allowing direct visible commenting was chosen. During the five week period of commenting, 26 users added 160 comments. After the review process, the comments were assessed by the editors and the original authors. The selected instrument provides a suitable means for online commenting of guidelines and facilitates the revision of the text.
制定指南几乎总是需要大量的时间和财政资源。因此，一项重要任务是识别和评估有助于指南制定工作的在线方法。在线共识会议：在制定金黄色葡萄球菌感染管理的S2k指南期间，使用德国研究网络提供的在线工具并结合电话会议举行了一次在线共识会议。在两小时的会议期间，未出现技术问题。参与者的一项调查显示，这种形式的接受率很高。在线评审：在更新德国银屑病治疗S3指南期间，进行了一次外部公开评审。选择了一个允许直接可见评论的在线平台。在为期五周的评论期内，26名用户添加了160条评论。评审过程结束后，编辑和原作者对评论进行了评估。所选工具为指南的在线评论提供了合适的方式，并便于文本的修订。
