Department of Plant Ecology, Justus-Liebig, Giessen, Germany.
J Environ Qual. 2012 Jul-Aug;41(4):1023-32. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0122.
Biochar derived from pyrolysis has received much attention recently as a soil additive to sequester carbon and increase soil fertility. Hydrochar, a brown, coal-like substance produced via hydrothermal carbonization, has also been suggested as a beneficial soil additive. However, before soil application, both types of char need to be tested for potential toxic effects. The aim of this study was to develop simple, inexpensive, and easy-to-apply test procedures to identify negative effects of chars but not to provide false-negative results. The following tests, based partly on ISO norm biotoxicity test procedures, were chosen: (i) cress germination test for gaseous phytotoxic emissions; (ii) barley germination and growth test; (iii) salad germination test; and (iv) earthworm avoidance test for toxic substances. Test reproducibility was ensured by carrying out each test procedure three times with the same biochar. Several modifications were necessary to adapt the tests for biochars/hydrochars. The tested biochar did not induce negative effects in any of the tests. In contrast, the beet-root chip hydrochar showed negative effects in all tests. In an extension to the regular procedure, a regrowth of the harvested barley shoots without further nutrient additions yielded positive results for the hydrochar, which initially had negative effects. This implies that the harmful substance(s) must have been degraded or they were water soluble and leached. Tests with a biochar and hydrochar showed that the proposed modified quick-check test procedures provide a fast assessment of risks and effects of char application to soils within a short period of time (<2 wk).
生物炭是通过热解得到的,最近作为一种土壤添加剂受到了广泛关注,因为它可以固定碳并增加土壤肥力。水热碳化得到的棕黑色类似煤炭的物质——水炭,也被认为是一种有益的土壤添加剂。然而,在应用于土壤之前,需要对这两种类型的炭进行潜在毒性影响的测试。本研究旨在开发简单、廉价且易于应用的测试程序,以识别炭的负面效应,但不提供假阴性结果。选择了以下测试,部分基于 ISO 标准生物毒性测试程序:(i)用于气态植物毒性排放的荠发芽测试;(ii)大麦发芽和生长测试;(iii)沙拉发芽测试;以及(iv)用于有毒物质的蚯蚓回避测试。通过用相同的生物炭进行三次重复测试,确保了测试的可重复性。为了适应生物炭/水炭的测试,需要进行一些修改。测试的生物炭在任何测试中均未引起负面效应。相比之下,甜菜根片水炭在所有测试中均显示出负面效应。作为常规程序的扩展,在没有进一步添加养分的情况下,收获的大麦芽重新生长,这对水炭产生了积极的结果,而水炭最初具有负面效应。这意味着有害物质必须已经降解,或者它们是水溶性的并被淋滤掉了。生物炭和水炭的测试表明,所提出的改良快速检查测试程序可在短时间内(<2 周)快速评估炭施用于土壤的风险和影响。