Cooper P David, Van den Broek Corry, Smart David R, Nishi Ron Y, Eastman David
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Diving Hyperb Med. 2009 Jun;39(2):63-70.
Incidences of decompression sickness of 0.76% have been reported in hyperbaric attendants exposed to routine 243 kPa treatment tables. Occupational health risks of this magnitude are not acceptable in routine clinical practice. Significant variations in procedures are therefore found between institutions in an attempt to enhance staff safety. In extreme cases, the use of multiplace chambers has been abandoned. Doppler ultrasound provides an objective tool to assess the sub-clinical decompression stress associated with any particular exposure.
To assess the decompression stress imposed upon staff exposed to our routine 243 kPa table and to elucidate demographic details within the attendant population that impact upon that stress.
prospective observational cohort study. Profile: 243 kPa for 90 min with a 20 min decompression on oxygen.
28 nursing and medical personnel routinely undertaking patient care under hyperbaric conditions.
Doppler assessment at 20 min intervals for up to 120 min post-exposure. Scoring: aural grading of intravascular bubbles using the Kisman-Masurel (K-M) scoring system; 163 exposures were scrutinized in this manner.
68% of exposures resulted in 'low' (K-M Grades 0-I), 22% in 'intermediate' (Grade II) and 10% in 'high' sub-clinical decompression stress (Grades III-IV). Female gender and increasing age, weight and exposure frequency showed trends towards higher bubble grades. There were no cases of clinical decompression sickness.
Our standard 243 kPa table conforms to DCIEM definitions of 'acceptable' decompression stress (Grade II or fewer bubbles in ≥50% of the subjects). Significant inter- and intra-individual variability was evident even within this one, tightly controlled dive profile.
据报道,暴露于常规243 kPa治疗方案的高压氧舱工作人员减压病发病率为0.76%。如此程度的职业健康风险在常规临床实践中是不可接受的。因此,各机构为提高工作人员安全性,在操作程序上存在显著差异。在极端情况下,多人舱的使用已被摒弃。多普勒超声提供了一种客观工具,可用于评估与任何特定暴露相关的亚临床减压应激。
评估暴露于我们常规243 kPa方案的工作人员所承受的减压应激,并阐明影响该应激的舱内人员的人口统计学细节。
前瞻性观察队列研究。方案:243 kPa,90分钟,20分钟吸氧减压。
28名在高压氧条件下常规进行患者护理的护理和医疗人员。
暴露后每隔20分钟进行多普勒评估,最长评估120分钟。评分:使用基斯曼 - 马苏雷尔(K - M)评分系统对血管内气泡进行听觉分级;以这种方式仔细检查了163次暴露情况。
68%的暴露导致“低”(K - M分级0 - I)亚临床减压应激,22%为“中度”(II级),10%为“高”亚临床减压应激(III - IV级)。女性以及年龄、体重和暴露频率增加呈现气泡分级升高的趋势。未出现临床减压病病例。
我们的标准243 kPa方案符合国防与民事研究所(DCIEM)对“可接受”减压应激的定义(≥50%的受试者中气泡为II级或更少)。即使在这一严格控制的潜水方案中,个体间和个体内的显著变异性也很明显。