Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Technikerstrasse 21A, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012 Aug 13;370(1972):3771-86. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0202.
We revisit critically the recent claims, inspired by quantum optics and quantum information, that there is entanglement in the biological pigment-protein complexes, and that it is responsible for the high transport efficiency. While unexpectedly long coherence times were experimentally demonstrated, the existence of entanglement is, at the moment, a purely theoretical conjecture; it is this conjecture that we analyse. As demonstrated by a toy model, a similar transport phenomenology can be obtained without generating entanglement. Furthermore, we also argue that, even if entanglement does exist, it is purely incidental and seems to play no essential role for the transport efficiency. We emphasize that our paper is not a proof that entanglement does not exist in light-harvesting complexes-this would require a knowledge of the system and its parameters well beyond the state of the art. Rather, we present a counter-example to the recent claims of entanglement, showing that the arguments, as they stand at the moment, are not sufficiently justified and hence cannot be taken as a proof for the existence of entanglement, let alone of its essential role, in the excitation transport.
我们重新审视了最近的一些观点,这些观点受到量子光学和量子信息的启发,认为生物色素-蛋白质复合物中存在纠缠现象,并且这种纠缠现象是导致高效传输的原因。尽管实验中已经证明了出人意料的长相干时间,但纠缠的存在目前只是一个纯粹的理论假设;我们分析的就是这个假设。一个玩具模型表明,在不产生纠缠的情况下,也可以获得类似的传输现象。此外,我们还认为,即使存在纠缠,它也是纯粹偶然的,对于传输效率似乎没有起到至关重要的作用。我们强调,我们的论文并不是证明光捕获复合物中不存在纠缠的证据——这需要对系统及其参数有超出现有技术水平的了解。相反,我们提出了一个对最近纠缠观点的反例,表明目前的论点没有得到充分证明,因此不能作为存在纠缠的证据,更不能作为其在激发传输中具有重要作用的证据。