Ostvik Leni, Eikeseth Svein, Klintwall Lars
Oslo and Akershus University College.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03393108.
This study replicated and extended Wright (2006) and Whitehurst, Ironsmith, and Goldfein (1974) by examining whether preschool aged children would increase their use of passive grammatical voice rather than using the more age-appropriate active grammatical construction when the former was modeled by an adult. Results showed that 5 of the 6 participants began using the passive voice after this verbal behavior had been modeled. For 3 of the participants, this change was large. The change occurred even though the adult model explicitly rewarded the participant with praise and stickers for using the active voice, while providing no praise or stickers for using the passive form that was modeled. For 1 participant, the modeling procedure had no effect on use of the passive voice. These results indicate a strong automatic reinforcement effect of achieving parity with the grammatical structures used by adults, compared to the effects of explicit reinforcement by the adult. This might help to explain why children acquire grammatical structures prevalent in their language community apparently without explicit instruction.
本研究重复并拓展了赖特(2006年)以及怀特赫斯特、艾恩史密斯和戈德费因(1974年)的研究,探究了学前儿童在成人示范使用被动语法语态时,是否会增加被动语法语态的使用,而非使用更符合其年龄阶段的主动语法结构。结果显示,6名参与者中有5名在这种言语行为被示范后开始使用被动语态。对其中3名参与者而言,这种变化幅度很大。即便成人示范者明确地用表扬和贴纸奖励使用主动语态的参与者,而对示范使用的被动形式不给予表扬或贴纸,这种变化依然发生了。对1名参与者来说,示范过程对被动语态的使用没有影响。这些结果表明,与成人的明确强化效果相比,与成人使用的语法结构保持一致具有强大的自动强化作用。这或许有助于解释为什么儿童在显然没有明确指导的情况下就能习得其语言社区中普遍存在的语法结构。