Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012 Jul;4(4):183-94. doi: 10.1177/1758834012443725.
The discovery of the molecular mechanisms underlying development of renal cell carcinoma have allowed for the development of novel targeted therapy for treatment of this disease. Recently, multiple agents have become approved by regulatory authorities for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, including sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab (with interferon alpha), pazopanib, temsirolimus and everolimus. While these therapies have generated excitement and have clearly altered the treatment paradigm, multiple limitations have been elucidated over time. These include but are not limited to the fact that treatment is not associated with complete responses, a significant number of patients are primarily refractory to treatment, and clinical trials mostly include clear cell histology. Furthermore, the role of these therapies in the treatment of brain metastases remains unclear and therapies can have considerable toxicities. RECIST criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) can be inadequate for the assessment of these modalities' treatment efficacy, and biomarkers predictive of individual patient benefit have been elusive. This review summarizes the major clinical data and discusses these limitations.
肾细胞癌发生发展的分子机制的发现,使得针对该疾病的新型靶向治疗成为可能。最近,监管机构已经批准了多种药物用于治疗晚期肾细胞癌,包括舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、贝伐单抗(联合干扰素α)、帕唑帕尼、替西罗莫司和依维莫司。虽然这些治疗方法令人兴奋,并明显改变了治疗模式,但随着时间的推移,也揭示出了多种局限性。这些局限性包括但不限于以下事实:治疗并不与完全缓解相关,相当数量的患者主要对治疗有抗性,临床试验大多包括透明细胞组织学。此外,这些治疗方法在治疗脑转移中的作用仍不清楚,并且治疗可能具有相当大的毒性。RECIST 标准(实体瘤反应评估标准)可能不足以评估这些方法的治疗效果,并且预测个体患者获益的生物标志物也难以捉摸。这篇综述总结了主要的临床数据,并讨论了这些局限性。