Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Piazzale C Golgi 19, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.
Med Oncol. 2012 Sep;29(3):1896-907. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0016-8. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
With six targeted agents approved (sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, bevacizumab [+interferon], everolimus and pazopanib), many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) will receive multiple therapies. However, the optimum sequencing approach has not been defined. A group of European experts reviewed available data and shared their clinical experience to compile an expert agreement on the sequential use of targeted agents in mRCC. To date, there are few prospective studies of sequential therapy. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus was approved for use in patients who failed treatment with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors (VEGFR) based on the results from a Phase III placebo-controlled study; however, until then, the only licensed agents across the spectrum of mRCC were VEGF(R) inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib and bevacizumab + interferon), and as such, a large body of evidence has accumulated regarding their use in sequence. Data show that sequential use of VEGF(R) inhibitors may be an effective treatment strategy to achieve prolonged clinical benefit. The optimal place of each targeted agent in the treatment sequence is still unclear, and data from large prospective studies are needed. The Phase III AXIS study of second-line sorafenib vs. axitinib (including post-VEGF(R) inhibitors) has completed, but the data are not yet published; other ongoing studies include the Phase III SWITCH study of sorafenib-sunitinib vs. sunitinib-sorafenib (NCT00732914); the Phase III 404 study of temsirolimus vs. sorafenib post-sunitinib (NCT00474786) and the Phase II RECORD 3 study of sunitinib-everolimus vs. everolimus-sunitinib (NCT00903175). Until additional data are available, consideration of patient response and tolerability to treatment may facilitate current decision-making regarding when to switch and which treatment to switch to in real-life clinical practice.
目前已有六种靶向药物获批(索拉非尼、舒尼替尼、替西罗莫司、贝伐珠单抗[联合干扰素]、依维莫司和帕唑帕尼),许多转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者将接受多种治疗。然而,最佳的序贯治疗方法尚未确定。一组欧洲专家回顾了现有数据并分享了他们的临床经验,以制定 mRCC 中靶向药物序贯使用的专家共识。迄今为止,关于序贯治疗的前瞻性研究较少。依维莫司(mTOR 抑制剂)是在基于 III 期安慰剂对照研究的结果获批用于血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和 VEGF 受体(VEGFR)抑制剂治疗失败的患者,然而在此之前,mRCC 全谱治疗中唯一获批的药物是 VEGF(R)抑制剂(索拉非尼、舒尼替尼和贝伐珠单抗[联合干扰素]),因此,关于其序贯应用积累了大量证据。数据表明,VEGF(R)抑制剂序贯应用可能是一种有效的治疗策略,可延长临床获益。每个靶向药物在治疗序列中的最佳位置尚不清楚,需要来自大型前瞻性研究的数据。二线索拉非尼对比阿昔替尼(包括 VEGF(R)抑制剂后)的 III 期 AXIS 研究已经完成,但数据尚未公布;其他正在进行的研究包括:二线索拉非尼-舒尼替尼对比舒尼替尼-索拉非尼的 III 期 SWITCH 研究(NCT00732914);二线替西罗莫司对比舒尼替尼后索拉非尼的 III 期 404 研究(NCT00474786)和二线舒尼替尼-依维莫司对比依维莫司-舒尼替尼的 II 期 RECORD 3 研究(NCT00903175)。在获得更多数据之前,考虑患者对治疗的反应和耐受性可能有助于当前决策,即在现实临床实践中何时进行转换以及转换哪种治疗方案。