• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 F11 级视障运动员在三级跳远和跳远项目中的助跑技术。

Evaluating the approach run of class F11 visually impaired athletes in triple and long jumps.

机构信息

Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science-TEFAA, Greece.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Apr;114(2):595-609. doi: 10.2466/05.15.27.PMS.114.2.595-609.

DOI:10.2466/05.15.27.PMS.114.2.595-609
PMID:22755463
Abstract

The present study examined stride pattern characteristics of Class F11 visually impaired long jumpers and triple jumpers. Athletes demonstrated initial ascending footfall variability followed by descending variability, on the second (long jumpers) and third (triple jumpers) stride prior to take-off, at a mean distance of 6.26 m (long jumpers) and 7.36 m (triple jumpers) from the take-off board. Toe-board-distance variability reached a maximum value of 0.36 m and 0.38 m for the long and triple jump, respectively. Last stride toe-board-distance variability was 0.29 m (long jump) and 0.25 m (triple jump). Class F11 visually impaired athletes exhibit regulation of goal-directed gait analogous to that of non-visually impaired athletes.

摘要

本研究考察了 F11 级视障跳远和三级跳远运动员的步幅模式特征。运动员在起跳前的第二(跳远)和第三(三级跳远)步中,脚跟着地的初始变异性增加,随后变异性降低,距离起跳板的平均距离分别为 6.26 米(跳远)和 7.36 米(三级跳远)。跳板距离变异性分别达到 0.36 米和 0.38 米的最大值。最后一步跳板距离变异性分别为 0.29 米(跳远)和 0.25 米(三级跳远)。F11 级视障运动员表现出类似于非视障运动员的目标导向步态调节。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the approach run of class F11 visually impaired athletes in triple and long jumps.评估 F11 级视障运动员在三级跳远和跳远项目中的助跑技术。
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Apr;114(2):595-609. doi: 10.2466/05.15.27.PMS.114.2.595-609.
2
Expertise and the regulation of gait in the approach phase of the long jump.跳远助跑阶段的专业技能与步态调节
J Sports Sci. 1997 Dec;15(6):597-605. doi: 10.1080/026404197367038.
3
Influence of visual impairment level on the regulatory mechanism used during the approach phase of a long jump.视觉障碍程度对跳远助跑阶段调节机制的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Aug;117(1):1073-87. doi: 10.2466/30.24.pms.117x11z6.
4
Locomotor control in the long jump approach run in young novice athletes.年轻新手运动员跳远助跑中的运动控制
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(2):149-56. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.810344. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
5
A biomechanical analysis of the long-jump technique of elite female amputee athletes.精英女性截肢运动员跳远技术的生物力学分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Oct;38(10):1829-35. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000230211.60957.2e.
6
Performance environment and nested task constraints influence long jump approach run: a preliminary study.运动表现环境和嵌套任务限制对跳远助跑的影响:一项初步研究。
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(12):1116-23. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1092567. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Step characteristic interaction and asymmetry during the approach phase in long jump.跳远助跑阶段的步长特征交互作用与不对称性。
J Sports Sci. 2017 Feb;35(4):346-354. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1164884. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
Variance and invariance in expert and novice triple jumpers.优秀和新手三级跳远运动员的差异与不变性。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993 Dec;64(4):404-12. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10607593.
9
Visual guidance during competition performance and run-through training in long jumping.跳远比赛和全程训练中的视觉引导。
Sports Biomech. 2006 Jan;5(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2006.9628221.
10
The effect of nonregulatory stimuli on the triple jump approach run.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Jun;69(2):129-35. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607678.

引用本文的文献

1
Jumping with control: the interplay between psychological constructs and run-up variability in elite jumpers.可控跳跃:精英跳远运动员心理结构与助跑变异性之间的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1412910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412910. eCollection 2024.
2
Spatiotemporal characteristics of motor actions by blind long jump athletes.盲人跳远运动员运动动作的时空特征
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Sep 28;3(1):e000252. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000252. eCollection 2017.