Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, & Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):1075-81. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000793. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
The utility of healthcare utilization data from US emergency departments (EDs) for rapid monitoring of changes in influenza-like illness (ILI) activity was highlighted during the recent influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Monitoring has tended to rely on detection algorithms, such as the Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS), which are limited in their ability to detect subtle changes and identify disease trends.
To evaluate a complementary approach, change point analysis (CPA), for detecting changes in the incidence of ED visits due to ILI.
Data collected through the Distribute project (isdsdistribute.org), which aggregates data on ED visits for ILI from over 50 syndromic surveillance systems operated by state or local public health departments were used. The performance was compared of the cumulative sum (CUSUM) CPA method in combination with EARS and the performance of three CPA methods (CUSUM, structural change model and Bayesian) in detecting change points in daily time-series data from four contiguous US states participating in the Distribute network. Simulation data were generated to assess the impact of autocorrelation inherent in these time-series data on CPA performance. The CUSUM CPA method was robust in detecting change points with respect to autocorrelation in time-series data (coverage rates at 90% when -0.2≤ρ≤0.2 and 80% when -0.5≤ρ≤0.5). During the 2008-9 season, 21 change points were detected and ILI trends increased significantly after 12 of these change points and decreased nine times. In the 2009-10 flu season, we detected 11 change points and ILI trends increased significantly after two of these change points and decreased nine times. Using CPA combined with EARS to analyze automatically daily ED-based ILI data, a significant increase was detected of 3% in ILI on April 27, 2009, followed by multiple anomalies in the ensuing days, suggesting the onset of the H1N1 pandemic in the four contiguous states.
As a complementary approach to EARS and other aberration detection methods, the CPA method can be used as a tool to detect subtle changes in time-series data more effectively and determine the moving direction (ie, up, down, or stable) in ILI trends between change points. The combined use of EARS and CPA might greatly improve the accuracy of outbreak detection in syndromic surveillance systems.
在美国急诊部(ED)的医疗利用数据对于快速监测流感样疾病(ILI)活动的变化非常有用,这在最近的甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间得到了强调。监测往往依赖于检测算法,例如早期异常报告系统(EARS),这些算法在检测细微变化和识别疾病趋势方面的能力有限。
评估一种补充方法,即变化点分析(CPA),用于检测由于 ILI 导致的急诊就诊发生率的变化。
使用通过 Distribute 项目(isdsdistribute.org)收集的数据,该项目聚合了 50 多个由州或地方公共卫生部门运营的综合征监测系统的 ILI 急诊就诊数据。比较了累积和(CUSUM)CPA 方法与 EARS 相结合的性能,以及在检测来自参与 Distribute 网络的四个连续美国州的每日时间序列数据中的变化点时,三种 CPA 方法(CUSUM、结构变化模型和贝叶斯)的性能。生成模拟数据以评估这些时间序列数据中固有的自相关对 CPA 性能的影响。CUSUM CPA 方法在检测时间序列数据中的变化点时具有很强的鲁棒性(当 -0.2≤ρ≤0.2 时覆盖率为 90%,当 -0.5≤ρ≤0.5 时覆盖率为 80%)。在 2008-9 季节期间,检测到 21 个变化点,其中 12 个变化点后 ILI 趋势显著增加,9 次下降。在 2009-10 流感季节,我们检测到 11 个变化点,其中 2 个变化点后 ILI 趋势显著增加,9 次下降。使用 CPA 与 EARS 相结合自动分析每日基于 ED 的 ILI 数据,检测到 2009 年 4 月 27 日 ILI 显著增加 3%,随后连续几天出现多次异常,表明这四个连续州的 H1N1 大流行已经开始。
作为 EARS 和其他异常检测方法的补充方法,CPA 方法可以用作检测时间序列数据中细微变化的工具,并确定 ILI 趋势在变化点之间的移动方向(即上升、下降或稳定)。EARS 和 CPA 的联合使用可能会大大提高综合征监测系统中爆发检测的准确性。