• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba.“谷歌流感趋势”和急诊分诊数据预测了曼尼托巴省 2009 年大流行 H1N1 波。
Can J Public Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;102(4):294-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03404053.
2
Emergency department and 'Google flu trends' data as syndromic surveillance indicators for seasonal influenza.急诊科数据和“谷歌流感趋势”数据作为季节性流感的症状监测指标。
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Nov;142(11):2397-405. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813003464. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Using Google Flu Trends data in forecasting influenza-like-illness related ED visits in Omaha, Nebraska.利用谷歌流感趋势数据预测内布拉斯加州奥马哈市与流感样疾病相关的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.052. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
4
Google Flu Trends Spatial Variability Validated Against Emergency Department Influenza-Related Visits.谷歌流感趋势空间变异性与急诊科流感相关就诊情况的验证
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 28;18(6):e175. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5585.
5
Assessing Google flu trends performance in the United States during the 2009 influenza virus A (H1N1) pandemic.评估 2009 年甲型流感病毒(H1N1)大流行期间谷歌流感趋势在美国的表现。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023610. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
6
Google Flu Trends: correlation with emergency department influenza rates and crowding metrics.谷歌流感趋势:与急诊流感发病率和拥挤度指标的相关性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 15;54(4):463-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir883. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
7
Using age, triage score, and disposition data from emergency department electronic records to improve Influenza-like illness surveillance.利用急诊科电子记录中的年龄、分诊分数和处置数据来改善流感样疾病监测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):688-96. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu002. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Reassessing Google Flu Trends data for detection of seasonal and pandemic influenza: a comparative epidemiological study at three geographic scales.重新评估谷歌流感趋势数据在季节性和大流行性流感检测中的作用:三个地理尺度的比较流行病学研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(10):e1003256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003256. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
9
What can digital disease detection learn from (an external revision to) Google Flu Trends?数字疾病检测能从(外部修订版的)谷歌流感趋势中学到什么?
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Performance of eHealth data sources in local influenza surveillance: a 5-year open cohort study.电子健康数据源在本地流感监测中的表现:一项为期5年的开放队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 28;16(4):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3099.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association of Acute Watery Diarrhea in Iranian Pilgrims of Iraq with Cholera Cases in Iranians.伊拉克伊朗朝圣者急性水样腹泻与伊朗霍乱病例的关联。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 May 15;37:52. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.52. eCollection 2023.
2
Real-Time Monitoring of Infectious Disease Outbreaks with a Combination of Google Trends Search Results and the Moving Epidemic Method: A Respiratory Syncytial Virus Case Study.结合谷歌趋势搜索结果与移动流行方法对传染病爆发进行实时监测:呼吸道合胞病毒案例研究
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 19;8(2):75. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020075.
3
Spatiotemporal evolution of online attention to vaccines since 2011: An empirical study in China.2011 年以来疫苗相关网络关注度的时空演变:中国的一项实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;10:949482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949482. eCollection 2022.
4
Online Search Behavior Related to COVID-19 Vaccines: Infodemiology Study.与新冠疫苗相关的在线搜索行为:信息流行病学研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Nov 12;1(1):e32127. doi: 10.2196/32127. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Prediction model for the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak in the global environment.全球环境中新冠疫情传播的预测模型
Heliyon. 2021 Jul;7(7):e07416. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07416. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
Using Google Trends to Predict Pediatric Respiratory Syncytial Virus Encounters at a Major Health Care System.利用谷歌趋势预测某大型医疗保健系统的儿科呼吸道合胞病毒就诊情况
J Med Syst. 2020 Jan 30;44(3):57. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-1526-8.
7
Using Social Media to Target Cancer Prevention in Young Adults: Viewpoint.利用社交媒体针对年轻人开展癌症预防工作:观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 5;20(6):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8882.
8
Monitoring Interest in Herpes Zoster Vaccination: Analysis of Google Search Data.监测带状疱疹疫苗接种的关注度:谷歌搜索数据分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 May 2;4(2):e10180. doi: 10.2196/10180.
9
Economic Recession and Obesity-Related Internet Search Behavior in Taiwan: Analysis of Google Trends Data.台湾的经济衰退与肥胖相关的网络搜索行为:谷歌趋势数据的分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Apr 6;4(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7314.
10
Respiratory syncytial virus tracking using internet search engine data.利用互联网搜索引擎数据追踪呼吸道合胞病毒。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5367-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimated cumulative incidence of pandemic (H1N1) influenza among pregnant women during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic.2009 年大流行第一波期间孕妇中流行(H1N1)流感的估计累积发病率。
CMAJ. 2010 Oct 5;182(14):1522-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100488. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
2
The influenza A(H5N1) epidemic at six and a half years: 500 notified human cases and more to come.甲型 H5N1 流感疫情六年半:已通报 500 例人类感染病例,未来还会有更多。
Euro Surveill. 2010 Jul 22;15(29):19619. doi: 10.2807/ese.15.29.19619-en.
3
Text and structural data mining of influenza mentions in Web and social media.流感在网络和社交媒体中提及的文本和结构数据挖掘。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Feb;7(2):596-615. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7020596. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
4
The utility of "Google Trends" for epidemiological research: Lyme disease as an example.“谷歌趋势”在流行病学研究中的应用:以莱姆病为例。
Geospat Health. 2010 May;4(2):135-7. doi: 10.4081/gh.2010.195.
5
Syndromic surveillance: the next phase of public health monitoring during the H1N1 influenza pandemic?症状监测:甲型H1N1流感大流行期间公共卫生监测的下一阶段?
Euro Surveill. 2009 Nov 5;14(44):19391.
6
Surveillance of the first 205 confirmed hospitalised cases of pandemic H1N1 influenza in Ireland, 28 April - 3 October 2009.2009 年 4 月 28 日至 10 月 3 日,爱尔兰对首例 205 例确诊住院的大流行性 H1N1 流感病例进行监测。
Euro Surveill. 2009 Nov 5;14(44):19389.
7
Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks.谷歌趋势:一种基于网络的疾病暴发实时监测工具。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 15;49(10):1557-64. doi: 10.1086/630200.
8
Interim analysis of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in Australia: surveillance trends, age of infection and effectiveness of seasonal vaccination.澳大利亚2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行的中期分析:监测趋势、感染年龄与季节性疫苗接种效果
Euro Surveill. 2009 Aug 6;14(31):19288. doi: 10.2807/ese.14.31.19288-en.
9
Early detection of disease outbreaks using the Internet.利用互联网早期发现疾病爆发。
CMAJ. 2009 Apr 14;180(8):829-31. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090215.
10
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.利用搜索引擎查询数据检测流感疫情。
Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1012-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07634.

“谷歌流感趋势”和急诊分诊数据预测了曼尼托巴省 2009 年大流行 H1N1 波。

"Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;102(4):294-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03404053.

DOI:10.1007/BF03404053
PMID:21913587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6974178/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the performance of syndromic indicators based on Google Flu Trends (GFT) and emergency department (ED) data for the early detection and monitoring of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic waves in Manitoba.

METHODS

Time-series curves for the weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed H1N1 cases in Manitoba during the 2009 pandemic were plotted against the three syndromic indicators: 1) GFT data, based on flu-related Internet search queries, 2) weekly count of all ED visits triaged as influenza-like illness (ED ILI volume), and 3) percentage of all ED visits that were triaged as an ILI (ED ILI percent). A linear regression model was fitted separately for each indicator and correlations with weekly virologic data were calculated for different lag periods for each pandemic wave.

RESULTS

All three indicators peaked 1-2 weeks earlier than the epidemic curve of laboratory-confirmed cases. For GFT data, the best-fitting model had about a 2-week lag period in relation to the epidemic curve. Similarly, the best-fitting models for both ED indicators were observed for a time lag of 1-2 weeks. All three indicators performed better as predictors of the virologic time trends during the second wave as compared to the first. There was strong congruence between the time series of the GFT and both the ED ILI volume and the ED ILI percent indicators.

CONCLUSION

During an influenza season characterized by high levels of disease activity, GFT and ED indicators provided a good indication of weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in Manitoba 1-2 weeks in advance.

摘要

目的

我们评估了基于 Google 流感趋势(GFT)和急诊数据的综合征指标在曼尼托巴省 2009 年 H1N1 大流行波的早期检测和监测中的表现。

方法

绘制了曼尼托巴省 2009 年大流行期间每周实验室确诊的 H1N1 病例数与三个综合征指标的时间序列曲线:1)GFT 数据,基于与流感相关的互联网搜索查询,2)每周所有分诊为流感样疾病(ED ILI 量)的急诊就诊人数,3)所有分诊为 ILI 的急诊就诊人数百分比(ED ILI 百分比)。为每个指标分别拟合线性回归模型,并计算不同大流行波的不同滞后期与每周病毒学数据的相关性。

结果

所有三个指标都比实验室确诊病例的流行曲线提前 1-2 周达到峰值。对于 GFT 数据,最佳拟合模型与流行曲线的滞后时间约为 2 周。同样,对于 ED 指标的最佳拟合模型,观察到的滞后时间为 1-2 周。与第一波相比,所有三个指标在预测病毒学时间趋势方面在第二波表现更好。GFT 与 ED ILI 量和 ED ILI 百分比两个指标的时间序列之间存在很强的一致性。

结论

在疾病活动水平较高的流感季节,GFT 和 ED 指标能够很好地预测曼尼托巴省每周实验室确诊流感病例数,提前 1-2 周。