Kurian Gino A, Berenshtein Eduard, Saada Ann, Chevion Mordechai
Department of Cellular Biochemistry and Human Genetics, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Schools of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2012;30(1):83-94. doi: 10.1159/000339043. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Inter-fibrillar (IFM) and sub-sarcolemmal (SSM) mitochondria are two distinct mitochondrial sub-populations and are expected to behave differently during pathological conditions. This study was undertaken to compare functional oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in IFM and SSM during ischemia, reperfusion and ischemic preconditioning.
Langendorff perfused Wistar rat hearts were subjected to 35minutes ischemia, 60minutes reperfusion and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) procedure (3cycles of 2-minutes ischemia followed by 3-minutes reperfusion).Subsequently IFM and SSM were isolated, and mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) enzyme activities and respiration were measured immediately.
Functional enzyme activities of ETC in IFM and SSM showed prominent differences especially in the proximal part of ETC enzymes during ischemia and reperfusion. SSM favor FADH(2 )while IFM prefer NADH as the main reducing equivalent for electron transport during ischemia and reperfusion. IPC preserved ETC enzyme activities in both IFM and SSM rendering cardio protection. Similarly IPC preserve ADP stimulated respiration with glutamate and malate as substrate in both sub populations, but not in IFM, with succinate as substrate. Apparently, the preconditioning imparts enhanced protection more to SSM than IFM during ischemia and reperfusion and especially to the proximal part of the ETC.
We propose that mitochondrial dysfunction, one of the major targets of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury needs to be evaluated by the synergic effect of both IFM and SSM.
肌原纤维间(IFM)线粒体和肌膜下(SSM)线粒体是两个不同的线粒体亚群,在病理状态下预计会有不同表现。本研究旨在比较缺血、再灌注和缺血预处理过程中IFM和SSM的功能性氧化磷酸化(OXPHOS)。
对采用Langendorff灌注的Wistar大鼠心脏进行35分钟缺血、60分钟再灌注和缺血预处理(IPC)程序(3个循环,每次2分钟缺血后接着3分钟再灌注)。随后分离IFM和SSM,并立即测量线粒体电子传递链(ETC)酶活性和呼吸作用。
IFM和SSM中ETC的功能性酶活性存在显著差异,尤其是在缺血和再灌注期间ETC酶的近端部分。在缺血和再灌注期间,SSM倾向于以FADH₂作为电子传递的主要还原当量,而IFM则更倾向于NADH。IPC可保留IFM和SSM中的ETC酶活性,从而提供心脏保护。同样,IPC可保留两个亚群中以谷氨酸和苹果酸为底物时ADP刺激的呼吸作用,但在IFM中以琥珀酸为底物时则不能。显然,预处理在缺血和再灌注期间对SSM的保护作用比对IFM更强,尤其是对ETC的近端部分。
我们提出,心肌缺血再灌注损伤的主要靶点之一线粒体功能障碍需要通过IFM和SSM的协同作用来评估。